Taking it a step farther: acknowledging librarians' systematic review work in the promotion or tenure process.
Librarians' contributions to systematic review projects receive inconsistent recognition within promotion or tenure processes. A review of thirty-six academic libraries' norms and procedures revealed only two that mentioned systematic reviews. Recognition and inclusion of systematic reviews and othe...
| Publicado en: | Journal of the Medical Library Association Vol. 114; no. 2; pp. 178 - 184 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
University of Pittsburgh, University Library System
Apr2026
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=193175635&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 193175635 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 15365050 PI8 jtl: Journal of the Medical Library Association issn: 15365050 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr2026 vid: 114 iid: 2 pid: 60406 pub: University of Pittsburgh, University Library System place: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 193175635 10.5195/jmla.2026.2202 193175635 ppf: 178 ppct: 6 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Taking it a step farther: acknowledging librarians' systematic review work in the promotion or tenure process. aug: au: Raszewski, Rebecca Goben, Abigail affil: Associate Professor & Information Services & Liaison Librarian, Library for the Health Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL sug: subj: Librarians Education Libraries, Academic Promotion and Tenure Faculty Psychosocial Factors Interprofessional Relations Professional Recognition Job Satisfaction Career Planning and Development Professional Practice, Evidence-Based Authorship Scholarly Communication Information Services Professional Organizations United States ab: Librarians' contributions to systematic review projects receive inconsistent recognition within promotion or tenure processes. A review of thirty-six academic libraries' norms and procedures revealed only two that mentioned systematic reviews. Recognition and inclusion of systematic reviews and other evidence synthesis is further complicated by variance in recognition of interdisciplinary work. This commentary provides recommendations for academic library leadership to establish standards for documenting and evaluating systematic review work in annual reviews and promotion or tenure, explicitly recognizing the value of participation in interdisciplinary scholarship, inclusion of search strategies as a scholarly output, and providing guidance for the external review process. We close with a call to action for professional organizations to establish centralized guidelines to ensure the full recognition of librarianship and scholarly participation in systematic reviews. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|