Examining the concurrent validity of markerless motion capture in dual-athlete team sports movements.
Markerless motion capture systems could help collect kinematic data in team sports. However, the validity of these systems when measuring multiple individuals simultaneously has yet to be determined. The current study aims to assess the concurrent validity of full-body kinematics during dyadic sport...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Sports Sciences Vol. 44; no. 10; pp. 1307 - 1319 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
May2026
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=193226896&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 193226896 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 02640414 5BV jtl: Journal of Sports Sciences issn: 02640414 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: May2026 vid: 44 iid: 10 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 193226896 186192107 193226896 193226896 10.1080/02640414.2025.2497678 193226896 ppf: 1307 ppct: 12 formats: tig: atl: Examining the concurrent validity of markerless motion capture in dual-athlete team sports movements. aug: au: Oonk, G. A. Kempe, M. Lemmink, K. A. P. M. Buurke, T. J. W. affil: Department of Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands sug: subj: Sports Participation Team Sports Motion Capture Methods Motion Capture Equipment and Supplies Imaging, Three-Dimensional Methods Kinematics Evaluation Task Performance and Analysis Human Male Female Adult Concurrent Validity Descriptive Statistics Data Analysis Software Confidence Intervals Funding Source Adult: 19-44 years Male Female ab: Markerless motion capture systems could help collect kinematic data in team sports. However, the validity of these systems when measuring multiple individuals simultaneously has yet to be determined. The current study aims to assess the concurrent validity of full-body kinematics during dyadic sports tasks of a markerless compared to a marker-based motion capture system. Twelve couples performed three dyadic movements: the walk high-five, dribble simulation, and double sidestep. Movements were simultaneously recorded with both systems. For each movement, the segment orientations, joint angles and center of mass were compared using the standardized typical estimate of the error, correlation coefficient, root mean squared difference (RMSD), and Bland-Altman analysis. There was an acceptable agreement in all segment orientations (RMSD < 12.5°), except for the hand segment. The flexion/extension joint angles showed an acceptable similarity between the two systems, excluding the wrist. There was a close-to-perfect similarity and agreement in the center of mass overall movement tasks. Based on the study results, the markerless motion capture system can be used for kinematic analysis of dyads in team sports, similar to how it is used in single-person movement analysis. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|