Are we there yet? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the validity and reliability of automated markerless motion capture systems during jumping tasks.
Accurate assessment of jumping is important for sports performance and rehabilitation. While laboratory-based motion capture is considered gold-standard, markerless motion capture (MMC) systems offer an accessible alternative for field and clinical settings. However, their validity and reliability v...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Sports Sciences Vol. 44; no. 10; pp. 1275 - 1296 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
| Formato: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
May2026
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=193226902&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 193226902 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 02640414 5BV jtl: Journal of Sports Sciences issn: 02640414 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: May2026 vid: 44 iid: 10 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 193226902 189625490 193226902 193226902 10.1080/02640414.2025.2589689 193226902 ppf: 1275 ppct: 21 formats: tig: atl: Are we there yet? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the validity and reliability of automated markerless motion capture systems during jumping tasks. aug: au: Ogura, Ayane Florio, Emily Wileman, Taylor M. Dennison, Louis Psarakis, Michael affil: Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan sug: subj: Jumping Automation Motion Capture Motion Analysis Systems Evaluation Biomechanics Task Performance and Analysis Lower Extremity Human Systematic Review Meta Analysis CINAHL Database Embase Medline SportDiscus Kinematics Kinetics Athletic Performance Funding Source Hip Knee Ankle Descriptive Statistics Data Analysis Software ab: Accurate assessment of jumping is important for sports performance and rehabilitation. While laboratory-based motion capture is considered gold-standard, markerless motion capture (MMC) systems offer an accessible alternative for field and clinical settings. However, their validity and reliability vary, warranting a comprehensive synthesis of current literature. Six databases (CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science) were searched following PRISMA for studies comparing MMC derived kinematics, kinetics or performance with gold-standard measures during vertical or horizontal jump tasks. Twenty studies met inclusion. The meta-analysis for sagittal-plane pooled root mean square error (RMSE) values were 5.3° for hip (95% CI 2.9–7.6°), 4.4° for knee (2.9–5.9°) and 4.9° for ankle (3.9–5.9°). Frontal-plane RMSE values were 3.0° for hip (2.5–3.5°) and 7.5° for ankle (4.1–10.9°). Pooled jump-height bias was −2.9 cm (−8.1 to 2.3 cm). Between-study heterogeneity ranged from low to substantial, with wider prediction intervals for sagittal hip, frontal ankle and jump height. This review suggests that current MMC systems can achieve moderate accuracy for lower limb jump biomechanics, but performance varies widely between systems and contexts. Practitioners should consider system-specific evidence to make informed decisions regarding the suitability of a given system for their needs. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|