Facilitation, Interference, or Both? Disentangling Processes in the Stroop, Simon, and Flanker Tasks Using Neutral Conditions and Distributional Analyses.

Inhibition is crucial to adapt to new situations and resist distraction, making it a central focus of research. Here, we compare three tasks considered as gold standards for measuring inhibition: the Stroop, Simon, and Flanker tasks. These tasks involve one relevant and one irrelevant dimension. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance Vol. 52; no. 4; pp. 486 - 516
Autores principales: Croizet, Pablo, Belletier, Clément, Jobert, Clotilde, Nahed, Yasmine, Ferrand, Ludovic
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Psychological Association Apr2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=193258107&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 193258107
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00961523
        EPH
      jtl: Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance
      issn: 00961523
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2026
      vid: 52
      iid: 4
      pid: 34
      pub: American Psychological Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        193258107
        10.1037/xhp0001409
      ppf: 486
      ppct: 30
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Facilitation, Interference, or Both? Disentangling Processes in the Stroop, Simon, and Flanker Tasks Using Neutral Conditions and Distributional Analyses.
      aug:
        au:
          Croizet, Pablo
          Belletier, Clément
          Jobert, Clotilde
          Nahed, Yasmine
          Ferrand, Ludovic
        affil:
          CNRS and Université Clermont Auvergne, LAPSCO
          Institut Universitaire de France
      keyword:
        conflict tasks
        facilitation
        inhibition
        interference
        neutral trials
        conflict tasks
        facilitation
        inhibition
        interference
        neutral trials
      ab: Inhibition is crucial to adapt to new situations and resist distraction, making it a central focus of research. Here, we compare three tasks considered as gold standards for measuring inhibition: the Stroop, Simon, and Flanker tasks. These tasks involve one relevant and one irrelevant dimension. In congruent trials, both dimensions activate the same response, whereas they activate opposing ones in incongruent trials. Global interference, the reaction time difference between these trial types, confounds both the facilitation and interference effect from the task-irrelevant dimension. To better understand the underlying processes at play within these tasks, we introduced neutral trials. Distributional analyses examined the impact of reaction time on mere interference (incongruent − neutral) and mere facilitation (congruent − neutral). Our findings, replicated in Experiment 2, challenge established theories by suggesting that the classic negative-going Simon delta plot reflects a transient and automatic facilitation process, rather than slow-building inhibition. Moreover, we show that the Stroop, Simon, and Flanker tasks differ systematically in how mere interference and mere facilitation shape global interference, while also warning against misinterpreting automatic processes as controlled processes in accounts of conflict resolution. Public Significance Statement: In daily life, we often rely on automated behaviors to efficiently navigate familiar tasks. However, novel or complex situations require cognitive control, the ability to regulate thoughts and actions to achieve specific goals. This study focuses on one key aspect of cognitive control: inhibition, our ability to suppress impulsive responses and distracting information. Inhibition is classically measured through conflict tasks, such as the Stroop, Simon, and Flanker tasks. In this work, we show that performance in these tasks may rely on automatic processes to the same extent as on controlled processes, such as inhibition. In some tasks, automatic processes may even play a stronger role, which directly challenges established theoretical frameworks.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N