The Right Not to Use the Internet: Concept, Contexts, Consequences.
This article discusses the book *The Right Not to Use the Internet* (2025), which explores the concept of the fundamental right not to use the Internet and its implications for democracy and individual rights. The authors, European researchers in law, political science, and philosophy, analyze this...
| Publicado en: | Nouvelles Perspectives en Sciences Sociales Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 423 - 428 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Editions Prise de parole
Nov2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=193349044&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 193349044 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 17128307 84PR jtl: Nouvelles Perspectives en Sciences Sociales issn: 17128307 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2025 vid: 21 iid: 1 pid: 48324 pub: Editions Prise de parole artinfo: ui: 193349044 ppf: 423 ppct: 5 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 325KB tig: atl: The Right Not to Use the Internet: Concept, Contexts, Consequences. aug: au: MICHAUD, ÉMILIE affil: Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Québec, Canada su: Privacy Autonomy (Psychology) Data privacy Digital inclusion Discrimination (Sociology) Government accountability Psychological vulnerability sug: subj: Privacy Autonomy (Psychology) Data privacy Digital inclusion Discrimination (Sociology) Government accountability Psychological vulnerability ab: This article discusses the book *The Right Not to Use the Internet* (2025), which explores the concept of the fundamental right not to use the Internet and its implications for democracy and individual rights. The authors, European researchers in law, political science, and philosophy, analyze this right as an extension of the rights to inclusion, privacy, and non-discrimination, emphasizing the responsibility of governments to guarantee non-digital alternatives to public services. The book examines the causes of non-use, whether related to digital vulnerability or a desire to preserve one’s autonomy in the face of risks associated with the exploitation of personal data. Finally, it highlights the importance of recognizing this right as an individual choice, while noting a lack of empirical studies and the limited consideration of non-users’ voices in the debate. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: French refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|