The Politics of Postliteracy.

This article centers on Mary Harrington’s analysis of the cultural and political transformations initiated by the printing press and their ongoing disruption by digital technologies, particularly smartphones. Harrington argues that the printing press was foundational to modernity, enabling scale and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Modern Age Vol. 68; no. 2; pp. 21 - 34
Autor principal: Callahan, Gene
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Intercollegiate Studies Institute Spring2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=193359379&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 193359379
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00267457
        MOA
      jtl: Modern Age
      issn: 00267457
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Spring2026
      vid: 68
      iid: 2
      pid: 641
      pub: Intercollegiate Studies Institute
    artinfo:
      ui: 193359379
      ppf: 21
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.8MB
      tig:
        atl: The Politics of Postliteracy.
      aug:
        au: Callahan, Gene
      sug:
      ab: This article centers on Mary Harrington’s analysis of the cultural and political transformations initiated by the printing press and their ongoing disruption by digital technologies, particularly smartphones. Harrington argues that the printing press was foundational to modernity, enabling scale and fixity in knowledge that shaped nation-states, democracy, and secularism, while literacy fundamentally altered human cognition. She contends that the digital revolution, marked by the smartphone’s ubiquity, represents a new "singularity" that is reshaping social interaction, political organization, and cognitive habits, leading to a postliterary age with uncertain political forms, possibly more autocratic or tribalized. Harrington also discusses the feminization of work as influenced by sociocultural and technological environments rather than solely by gender, and she expresses skepticism about dystopian visions of totalitarian capitalism, suggesting demographic and cognitive declines may instead drive future societal change.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Modern Age is the property of Intercollegiate Studies Institute and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Modern Age
      holder: Intercollegiate Studies Institute
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2026
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N