Progress Through Engagement: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Community‐Based Participatory Research in Vision Impairment.

Background: Vision impairment (VI) presents complex challenges that extend beyond clinical measures, affecting individuals' mental health, social participation and quality of life. Traditional research often overlooks these lived realities, prompting a growing interest in community‐based participato...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Health Expectations Vol. 29; no. 2; pp. 1 - 21
Autores principales: Tavoulari, Aikaterini, Kidwai, Jibraan, Proulx, Michael J., Petrini, Karin
Formato: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Apr2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=193365361&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 193365361
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13696513
        EVY
      jtl: Health Expectations
      issn: 13696513
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2026
      vid: 29
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        193365361
        193365361
        193365361
        10.1111/hex.70640
        193365361
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 20
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Progress Through Engagement: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Community‐Based Participatory Research in Vision Impairment.
      aug:
        au:
          Tavoulari, Aikaterini
          Kidwai, Jibraan
          Proulx, Michael J.
          Petrini, Karin
        affil: Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
      sug:
        subj:
          Vision Disorders
          Action Research
          Social Participation
          Community Health Services
          Qualitative Studies
          Persons with Visual Disabilities
          Human
          Systematic Review
          Cultural Diversity
          Photography
          Narratives
          Storytelling
          Focus Groups
          Creativeness
          Seminars and Workshops
          Thematic Analysis
          Health Services Accessibility
          Embase
          Cochrane Library
          Psycinfo
          Checklists
          Funding Source
          ERIC Database
          PubMed
          Medline
          CINAHL Database
      ab: Background: Vision impairment (VI) presents complex challenges that extend beyond clinical measures, affecting individuals' mental health, social participation and quality of life. Traditional research often overlooks these lived realities, prompting a growing interest in community‐based participatory research (CBPR) as a more inclusive and impactful approach. Methods: This systematic review examines the scope, frequency and methodological characteristics of CBPR studies involving people with VI, with a focus on qualitative research published between 1993 and 2024. Following PRISMA guidelines and PROSPERO registration, included studies were identified across diverse cultural contexts and participatory depths, from consultation to collaboration and user‐driven design. Using a dual‐stage thematic synthesis, we explored both the methodological approaches ('how') and the substantive content themes ('what') addressed in these studies. Participatory methods included photography and narrative storytelling, focus groups, creative workshops and final consultations, with many studies employing methodological triangulation. Although the search covered the period 1993–2024, all included studies were published between 2014 and 2024, reflecting the recent emergence of CBPR approaches in VI research. Results: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final synthesis. Thematic findings revealed barriers to accessibility, cultural misalignment in interventions and the importance of user‐led adaptation strategies, showing that despite growing interest, CBPR remains underutilised in VI research. Conclusion: This review highlights its potential to bridge gaps between clinical innovation and lived experience, offering a roadmap for more equitable, context‐sensitive and user‐centred research practices. Patient or Public Contribution: Patients and members of the public were not directly involved in the design, conduct, or analysis of this systematic literature review. Instead, the study focus and synthesis were informed by documented experiences of people with vision impairment, derived from community‐based participatory studies, which contributed to the development of patient‐centred health material design.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N