Preview position versus length: Key factors in the time course of parallel processing in multitasking.
Multitasking research has shown that individuals differ in whether they prefer a more serial or a more parallel mode of task processing at the level of whole tasks. Such preferences can be identified using the task switching with preview (TSWP) paradigm. This paradigm allows, but does not require, i...
| Publicado en: | Memory & Cognition Vol. 54; no. 3; pp. 767 - 792 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Apr2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=193392416&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 193392416 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0090502X MEG jtl: Memory & Cognition issn: 0090502X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr2026 vid: 54 iid: 3 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 193392416 10.3758/s13421-025-01780-3 ppf: 767 ppct: 25 formats: tig: atl: Preview position versus length: Key factors in the time course of parallel processing in multitasking. aug: au: Brüning, Jovita affil: https://ror.org/00ggpsq73 Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany https://ror.org/03v4gjf40 Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany su: Task performance Human multitasking Research funding Descriptive statistics One-way analysis of variance Data analysis software Time sug: subj: Task performance Human multitasking Research funding Descriptive statistics One-way analysis of variance Data analysis software Time keyword: Inter-individual differences Multitasking Parallel processing Task switching Inter-individual differences Multitasking Parallel processing Task switching ab: Multitasking research has shown that individuals differ in whether they prefer a more serial or a more parallel mode of task processing at the level of whole tasks. Such preferences can be identified using the task switching with preview (TSWP) paradigm. This paradigm allows, but does not require, individuals to preview the stimulus of the next task switch in a predictable task switching procedure [AAABBB...]. Although several studies have shown that some participants consistently use the preview information, it is still unclear when exactly this information is used and, thus, how parallel processing takes place. The present study is an important step in clarifying this issue. In two experiments, I investigated when exactly individuals who prefer parallel processing during task switching use a preview to prepare for the next task switch. In Experiment 1, the onset and thus the length of the preview was varied within participants. This allowed to disentangle whether parallel processing of the preview depends on the length of the preview (i.e., its likelihood increases with longer preview presentation), or occurs contingent on a single trial (i.e., is a rapid process). Strikingly, parallel processing occurred regardless of preview duration, suggesting that a short preview may be sufficient. In Experiment 2, participants received the preview in discrete steps, i.e., with the same length throughout the sequence. There was a clear peak in the use of the preview immediately before a task switch. This suggests that although individuals who prefer parallel processing are able to process information in parallel throughout a task sequence, they clearly prefer to do so just before the task switch. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|