Is "Remember"-Recognition Faster Than "Know"-Recognition an Experimental Artefact? Revealing Properties of Recollection and Familiarity.
In published studies using the remember/know judgement paradigm, the remember-based old/new responses (supposed to be slow and effortful) are on average faster than the know-based responses (supposed to be fast and automatic), contrary to the dual-process theories' view. One widely believed cause of...
| Publicado en: | Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale Vol. 80; no. 2; pp. 89 - 106 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Canadian Psychological Association
Jun2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=193505228&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 193505228 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 11961961 CJX jtl: Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale issn: 11961961 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2026 vid: 80 iid: 2 pid: 98 pub: Canadian Psychological Association artinfo: ui: 193505228 10.1037/cep0000379 ppf: 89 ppct: 17 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 759KB tig: atl: Is "Remember"-Recognition Faster Than "Know"-Recognition an Experimental Artefact? Revealing Properties of Recollection and Familiarity. aug: au: Jou, Jerwen Hwang, Mark affil: Department of Psychological Science, University of Texas--Rio Grande Valley Department of Business Information Systems, Central Michigan University su: Recognition (Psychology) Episodic memory Sex distribution Decision making Students Memory Analysis of variance Cognition Statistical power analysis Data analysis Research funding Experimental design Statistics Reaction time Data analysis software Thought & thinking Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics) sug: subj: Recognition (Psychology) Episodic memory Sex distribution Decision making Students Memory Analysis of variance Cognition Statistical power analysis Data analysis Research funding Experimental design Statistics Reaction time Data analysis software Thought & thinking Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics) keyword: remember faster than know judgements remember/know judgement instruction effects remember/know judgements speeds of remember/know judgements effets des directives liées aux jugements « rappel »/« savoir » jugement du « rappel » plus rapide que le jugement du « savoir ». jugements du « rappel » et du « savoir » rapidité des jugements du « rappel » et du « savoir » remember faster than know judgements remember/know judgement instruction effects remember/know judgements speeds of remember/know judgements effets des directives liées aux jugements « rappel »/« savoir » jugement du « rappel » plus rapide que le jugement du « savoir ». jugements du « rappel » et du « savoir » rapidité des jugements du « rappel » et du « savoir » ab: In published studies using the remember/know judgement paradigm, the remember-based old/new responses (supposed to be slow and effortful) are on average faster than the know-based responses (supposed to be fast and automatic), contrary to the dual-process theories' view. One widely believed cause of this finding is that it is an experimental artefact, meaning participants are unknowingly influenced by the instruction to first consider the remember before the know alternative. In Experiment 1, we hinted to participants to first consider the know experience. This did not reverse the order of the two response times (RT). In Experiment 2, we explicitly told them to first consider the familiarity experience. Additionally, we used a decision criterion favouring making quick familiarity responses. These measures significantly lowered the RT and increased the proportion of familiarity-based responses. However, they did not change the RT of the recollection-based responses and did not reverse the relative order of the two RTs. Based on this finding and participants' inability to inhibit the retrieval of contextual details, we concluded that the paradoxical RT results are probably not an experimental artefact and that retrieval of detailed information in recollective recognition might be automatic. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|