Motivations and expectations for spinal cord epidural stimulation study participation: perspectives from individuals with spinal cord injury and caregivers.

Study Design: Qualitative, semi structured interviews. Objectives: Spinal cord epidural stimulation (scES) has shown promise for improving autonomic and motor function in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Participation in translational studies often requires relocation, uprooting the indivi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Spinal Cord Vol. 64; no. 5; pp. 423 - 431
Autores principales: Alvarez-Madrid, Elsa, Herrity, April, Rich, Carla, Brothers, Kyle, Harkema, Susan, Hubscher, Charles, Ugiliweneza, Beatrice
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature May2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=193628214&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 193628214
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13624393
        DZQ
      jtl: Spinal Cord
      issn: 13624393
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2026
      vid: 64
      iid: 5
      pid: 2579
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: Dordrecht, <Blank>
    artinfo:
      ui:
        193628214
        193628214
        193628214
        10.1038/s41393-026-01197-y
        193628214
      ppf: 423
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Motivations and expectations for spinal cord epidural stimulation study participation: perspectives from individuals with spinal cord injury and caregivers.
      aug:
        au:
          Alvarez-Madrid, Elsa
          Herrity, April
          Rich, Carla
          Brothers, Kyle
          Harkema, Susan
          Hubscher, Charles
          Ugiliweneza, Beatrice
        affil: https://ror.org/01ckdn478 Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Spinal Cord Injuries Therapy
          Spinal Cord Stimulation
          Epidural Space
          Motivation
          Research Subject Recruitment
          Caregivers Psychosocial Factors
          Attitude to Medical Treatment
          Human
          Funding Source
          Kentucky
          Academic Medical Centers Kentucky
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Secondary Analysis
          Comparative Studies
          Descriptive Statistics
          Qualitative Studies
          Semi-Structured Interview
          Thematic Analysis
          Data Analysis Software
          Patient Attitudes
          Caregiver Attitudes
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Study Design: Qualitative, semi structured interviews. Objectives: Spinal cord epidural stimulation (scES) has shown promise for improving autonomic and motor function in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Participation in translational studies often requires relocation, uprooting the individual and caregivers from their community. Recognizing this burden, this study aimed to explore the motivations and expectations driving the decision to participate in a scES study. Setting: Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, USA. Methods: 23 interviews were conducted at enrollment in a randomized trial evaluating scES efficacy. Respondents were 18 individuals with SCI (40 ± 10 years old, 12 ± 10 years since injury, 44% males, all cervical, ASIA Impairment Scale: 39% A, 39% B, 22% C) and 5 caregivers. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with a thematic approach. Results: Four main themes emerged: gaining independence, improving function, benevolence, and other. Participants and caregivers hoped that improved function would lead to more independence—described as "a little more freedom," "experience the world," and to "not rely on someone." Any change was expressed as improving the quality of life. Many managed their expectations by recognizing the impact of individual characteristics on outcomes. Even if no improvement occurred, participation felt meaningful—motivated by benevolence and a desire to advance SCI research and help others. Conclusions: People with SCI and their caregivers participate in scES research with cautious optimism to gain freedom and improve quality of life through improved function. They also aim to help others through advancing science. Sponsorship: This work was funded by Department of Defense (W81XWH-19-1-0734). The parent study was funded by Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation, Leona M. & Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, and Medtronic Plc for spinal cord epidural stimulation implants.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N