Seeing no evil? Social vulnerabilities, collective inference, and organizational divergence.

This article examines the relationship between social vulnerabilities and the attention paid to them by local governments. Drawing from collective action and cognitive theories, we conceptualize planning as an organization-level inference process of selecting strategies to minimize gaps between expe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory Vol. 36; no. 2; pp. 205 - 219
Main Authors: Deslatte, Aaron, Stokan, Eric, Chung, Juwon
Format: Article
Published: Oxford University Press / USA Apr2026
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=193631224&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 193631224
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10531858
        172N
      jtl: Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory
      issn: 10531858
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2026
      vid: 36
      iid: 2
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        193631224
        10.1093/jopart/muaf034
      ppf: 205
      ppct: 14
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Seeing no evil? Social vulnerabilities, collective inference, and organizational divergence.
      aug:
        au:
          Deslatte, Aaron
          Stokan, Eric
          Chung, Juwon
        affil:
          Paul H. O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University Bloomington, 1315 E. Tenth Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States
          Department of Political Science, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, 427 Public Policy Building, Baltimore, MD 21250, United States
      su:
        Institutional cooperation
        Urban planning
        Institutional environment
        Bayesian analysis
        Hazards
        Inferential statistics
        Risk management in business
      sug:
        subj:
          Institutional cooperation
          Urban planning
          Land Subdivision
          Administration of Urban Planning and Community and Rural Development
          Institutional environment
          Bayesian analysis
          Hazards
          Inferential statistics
          Risk management in business
      keyword:
        active inference
        collective action theory
        copyrightHolder:Public Management Research Association
        copyrightYear:2026
        inLanguage:en
        local government
        publisher:Oxford University Press
        sameAs:https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaf034
        social vulnerability
        active inference
        collective action theory
        copyrightHolder:Public Management Research Association
        copyrightYear:2026
        inLanguage:en
        local government
        publisher:Oxford University Press
        sameAs:https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaf034
        social vulnerability
      ab: This article examines the relationship between social vulnerabilities and the attention paid to them by local governments. Drawing from collective action and cognitive theories, we conceptualize planning as an organization-level inference process of selecting strategies to minimize gaps between expected and desired futures. Responding to public administration scholars who have called for advancing theories of managing risks, we examine whether local planning processes are responsive to community disadvantages and how the administrative arrangements and coordination efforts of local governments influence this sensitivity. In doing so, we highlight a phenomenon labeled organizational divergence , in which a collective's perceived community disadvantages differ from reality. Examining climate action, economic development and sustainability plans, combined with survey and spatial data on environmental burdens for 462 municipal governments, we find evidence, using a multiphase Bayesian analytic strategy, that institutional designs which empower professional city managers increase the probability cities will engage in broader types of planning but decrease the odds they will prioritize social vulnerabilities. However, these cities are more likely to minimize divergence relative to mobility and water-related vulnerabilities. Conversely, greater functional coordination across governmental units increases the probability of prioritizing vulnerabilities in planning but also increases organizational divergence.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N