Assessing Risk Thresholds in Controlled Human Infection Models (CHIM).

Controlled Human Infection Models (CHIMs) are a type of clinical trial involving deliberately exposing human volunteers to an infectious agent. Compared to studies of natural infection, CHIMs offers distinctive benefits, from the ability to study presymptomatic infection to a direct assessment of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Bioethics Vol. 40; no. 5; pp. 519 - 530
Autores principales: Nord‐Bronzyk, Alexa, Young, Barnaby, Menikoff, Jerry, Savulescu, Julian, Owen Schaefer, G.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jun2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=193814585&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 193814585
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02699702
        6PJ
      jtl: Bioethics
      issn: 02699702
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2026
      vid: 40
      iid: 5
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        193814585
        10.1111/bioe.70072
      ppf: 519
      ppct: 11
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Assessing Risk Thresholds in Controlled Human Infection Models (CHIM).
      aug:
        au:
          Nord‐Bronzyk, Alexa
          Young, Barnaby
          Menikoff, Jerry
          Savulescu, Julian
          Owen Schaefer, G.
        affil:
          Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singpaore, Singapore
          National Centre for Infectious Diseases
          Uehiro Oxford Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
      su:
        Community support
        Clinical trials
        Human research subjects
        Public opinion
        Informed consent (Medical law)
        Research ethics
        Disease risk factors
        Mortality risk factors
        Risk assessment
        Biological models
        Safety
        Vaccine effectiveness
        Infection
        Adverse health care events
        Stakeholder analysis
      sug:
        subj:
          Community support
          Clinical trials
          Human research subjects
          Public opinion
          Informed consent (Medical law)
          Research ethics
          Disease risk factors
          Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
          Mortality risk factors
          Risk assessment
          Biological models
          Safety
          Vaccine effectiveness
          Infection
          Adverse health care events
          Stakeholder analysis
      keyword:
        challenge trials
        research ethics
        risk thresholds
        risk‐benefit assessments
        challenge trials
        research ethics
        risk thresholds
        risk‐benefit assessments
      ab: Controlled Human Infection Models (CHIMs) are a type of clinical trial involving deliberately exposing human volunteers to an infectious agent. Compared to studies of natural infection, CHIMs offers distinctive benefits, from the ability to study presymptomatic infection to a direct assessment of the efficacy of vaccines and therapeutics in a shorter time and involving fewer participants. Although the CHIMs do not fundamentally differ from other early‐phase clinical trials, they raise a unique set of ethical considerations. Modern CHIMs have been limited to studies which pose very low risk of participants experiencing serious adverse events, and CHIMs which lie on the upper end of risk remain controversial. Setting risk thresholds for more hazardous trials has become a topic of debate leading to various attempts to develop a model to ethically evaluate these risks. While there are now well‐accepted practices around established pathogens, future pandemics may involve more extreme threats to public health and CHIMs may have an important emergency rescue function, with some groups willing to undertake significant risks. We must ask, what risk of death and serious morbidity should future CHIMs permit in the face of such challenges? This paper proposes a taxonomy laying out three possible approaches for thinking about risk thresholds in CHIM: (1) consistency; (2) engaging community perspectives; and (3) no risk threshold. We explore the strengths and weaknesses of each approach and offer a resource for those in the research community to inform their evaluation of the ethical permissibility of current and future CHIM.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N