Evaluating the Agreement of Markerless Motion Capture for Joint Angle Estimation in a Constrained Hallway Setting Compared With a Traditional Laboratory Setting.

Gait analysis is a valuable approach for understanding human movement, but the space and setup requirements of traditional marker-based systems can limit their use outside specialized laboratories. Markerless motion capture may provide a more flexible option, though its agreement in constrained envi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Applied Biomechanics Vol. 42; no. 3; pp. 1 - 10
Autores principales: Ruder, Matthew, Di Bacco, Vincenzo E., Outerleys, Jereme, Malek, Monica, Laende, Elise, Gafoor, Fatima, Madden, Kim, Adili, Anthony, Deluzio, Kevin, Kobsar, Dylan
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc. Jun2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=193959811&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 193959811
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10658483
        0DM
      jtl: Journal of Applied Biomechanics
      issn: 10658483
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2026
      vid: 42
      iid: 3
      pid: 553
      pub: Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc.
      place: Champaign, Illinois
    artinfo:
      ui:
        193959811
        193959811
        193959811
        10.1123/jab.2025-0265
        193959811
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Evaluating the Agreement of Markerless Motion Capture for Joint Angle Estimation in a Constrained Hallway Setting Compared With a Traditional Laboratory Setting.
      aug:
        au:
          Ruder, Matthew
          Di Bacco, Vincenzo E.
          Outerleys, Jereme
          Malek, Monica
          Laende, Elise
          Gafoor, Fatima
          Madden, Kim
          Adili, Anthony
          Deluzio, Kevin
          Kobsar, Dylan
        affil: Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Motion Capture
          Gait Analysis Methods
          Motion Analysis Systems
          Lower Extremity Physiology
          Joints Physiology
          Kinematics Evaluation
          Human
          Comparative Studies
          Torso Physiology
          Flexion
          Funding Source
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Standing
          Walking Physiology
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Imaging, Three-Dimensional
          Rising
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
          Experimental Studies
          Self Report
          Visual Analog Scaling
          Scales
          Hip Joint Physiology
          Knee Joint Physiology
          Ankle Joint Physiology
          Data Analysis Software
          Descriptive Statistics
          Abduction
          Adduction
          Extension
          Posture
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Gait analysis is a valuable approach for understanding human movement, but the space and setup requirements of traditional marker-based systems can limit their use outside specialized laboratories. Markerless motion capture may provide a more flexible option, though its agreement in constrained environments compared with traditional spaces is not well established. This study compared a 10-camera markerless system deployed in a hallway with a traditional 8-camera laboratory setup. Twenty-five healthy adults (15 females, 10 males; age 34 [16] y) completed quiet standing, 60 seconds of self-selected walking, and 5-repetition sit-to-stand tasks at both sites on the same day. Three-dimensional pose estimates were processed to calculate alignment during standing, lower-limb joint kinematics during walking, and trunk flexion during sit-to-stand. Agreement within and between sites was assessed using Pearson correlations, root mean square error, Bland Altman limits of agreement, and intraclass correlation coefficients. Standing and walking outcomes showed excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficients ≥.97; root mean square error < 2.3°; mean differences < 1.1°). Sit-to-stand was more variable (limits of agreement 12°–20°) but remained highly reliable (intraclass correlation coefficients >.96). These findings indicate that a constrained markerless setup can yield kinematic data comparable to a laboratory arrangement, suggesting potential for broader use of markerless approaches in diverse environments.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N