Conflict of interest in trials of internet-based interventions for depression: Systematic review and meta-regression.

Objective: To investigate (a) the prevalence of industry sponsorship (InS), researchers' financial conflicts of interest (RFCOI) and researcher allegiance (RA) in clinical trials of internet-based interventions (IBI) for depression and (b) their possible relation with treatment effects. Method: We c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Psychotherapy Research Vol. 36; no. 5; pp. 845 - 856
Autores principales: Munder, Thomas, Barthelmes, Berit, Weber, Lenny, Flückiger, Christoph, Kerber, André, Krieger, Tobias, Watzke, Birgit, Wolf, Markus
Formato: Literature Review
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jun2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=193980068&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 193980068
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10503307
        10T
      jtl: Psychotherapy Research
      issn: 10503307
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2026
      vid: 36
      iid: 5
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        193980068
        10.1080/10503307.2025.2538549
      ppf: 845
      ppct: 11
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Conflict of interest in trials of internet-based interventions for depression: Systematic review and meta-regression.
      aug:
        au:
          Munder, Thomas
          Barthelmes, Berit
          Weber, Lenny
          Flückiger, Christoph
          Kerber, André
          Krieger, Tobias
          Watzke, Birgit
          Wolf, Markus
        affil:
          Department of Psychology, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany
          Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
          Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
          Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
          Institute of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
          Population Research Center, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
      su:
        Clinical trials
        Mental depression
        Conflict of interests
        Digital health
        Evidence synthesis
        Treatment effectiveness
        Research funding
      sug:
        subj:
          Clinical trials
          Mental depression
          Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
          Conflict of interests
          Digital health
          Evidence synthesis
          Treatment effectiveness
          Research funding
      keyword:
        depression
        financial conflict of interest
        industry sponsorship
        internet-based interventions
        meta-analysis
        researcher allegiance
        depression
        financial conflict of interest
        industry sponsorship
        internet-based interventions
        meta-analysis
        researcher allegiance
      ab: Objective: To investigate (a) the prevalence of industry sponsorship (InS), researchers' financial conflicts of interest (RFCOI) and researcher allegiance (RA) in clinical trials of internet-based interventions (IBI) for depression and (b) their possible relation with treatment effects. Method: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 94 comparisons of therapist-guided or self-guided IBI with a passive control group. Results: InS was present in 13 (38.24%) out of 34 comparisons of commercial IBI; RFCOI was present in 29 (30.85%), RA in 75 (79.79%) out of all 94 comparisons. In primary meta-regressions, presence of InS and RFCOI was significantly associated with larger treatment effects, while presence of RA was not. Overall, sensitivity analyses showed consistent results, but suggested differential results for trials of therapist-guided and self-guided IBI: While InS and RFCOI showed larger effects in trials of self-guided IBI, no effect was found for trials of therapist-guided IBI. Conclusion: InS, RFCOI, and RA are prevalent and should receive more attention in IBI research. The role of RA on outcome warrants further investigation because this meta-analysis did not include comparative trials. Small effect sizes in trials without InS or RFCOI suggest that current meta-analytic efficacy estimates of self-guided IBI for depression are overestimated.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Literature Review
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N