NBA-Drafted vs. Non-Drafted Basketball Players: A Comparative Analysis of Neuromuscular Performance Characteristics.

Cabarkapa, D, Cabarkapa, DV, Comfort, P, and Fry, AC. NBA-drafted vs. non-drafted basketball players: A comparative analysis of neuromuscular performance characteristics. J Strength Cond Res 40(6): 689–694, 2026—The purpose of this investigation was to examine differences in lower-body neuromuscular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research Vol. 40; no. 6; pp. 689 - 695
Autores principales: Cabarkapa, Dimitrije, Cabarkapa, Damjana V., Comfort, Paul, Fry, Andrew C.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Jun2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=193984350&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 193984350
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10648011
        JSC
      jtl: Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
      issn: 10648011
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2026
      vid: 40
      iid: 6
      pid: 5086
      pub: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      place: Baltimore, Maryland
    artinfo:
      ui:
        193984350
        193984350
        193984350
        10.1519/JSC.0000000000005395
        193984350
      ppf: 689
      ppct: 6
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: NBA-Drafted vs. Non-Drafted Basketball Players: A Comparative Analysis of Neuromuscular Performance Characteristics.
      aug:
        au:
          Cabarkapa, Dimitrije
          Cabarkapa, Damjana V.
          Comfort, Paul
          Fry, Andrew C.
        affil: D2 Lab, Novi Sad, Serbia
      sug:
        subj:
          Basketball Physiology
          Muscle Strength Physiology
          Lower Extremity Physiology
          Athletic Performance Physiology
          Athletes, Professional Psychosocial Factors
          Athletes, Male Psychosocial Factors
          Biomechanics
          Human
          Male
          Adult
          Europe
          Comparative Studies
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Muscle, Skeletal Physiology
          Body Height
          Body Weight
          Muscle Contraction
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Exercise Test
          Physical Endurance
          Body Composition
          Anthropometry
          T-Tests
          Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
          Confidence Intervals
          Statistical Significance
          Data Analysis Software
          Descriptive Statistics
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Male
      ab: Cabarkapa, D, Cabarkapa, DV, Comfort, P, and Fry, AC. NBA-drafted vs. non-drafted basketball players: A comparative analysis of neuromuscular performance characteristics. J Strength Cond Res 40(6): 689–694, 2026—The purpose of this investigation was to examine differences in lower-body neuromuscular performance characteristics between National Basketball Association (NBA)-drafted and non-drafted professional male basketball players. Eighty-six athletes volunteered to participate in this study, from which 10 were NBA first or second round draft picks, and the remaining 76 were nondrafted athletes playing at various professional basketball leagues across Europe. Each athlete performed 2 countermovement vertical jumps (CMJs) with no arm swing while standing on a dual uniaxial force plate system sampling at 1,000 Hz. Twenty-four force-time metrics were included in the analysis, within both braking (i.e., eccentric) and propulsive (i.e., concentric) phases of the CMJ. Independent-sample t -tests were used to determine statistically significant between-group differences (p < 0.05), whereas Cohen's d was used to determine difference magnitudes. Overall, the findings indicate that NBA-drafted athletes displayed considerably greater force and power-producing capabilities when compared with their non-drafted counterparts, when expressed in absolute terms, such as mean braking force (1,016.4 ± 79.6 vs. 913.8 ± 93.1 N), peak braking power (2,151.7 ± 576.1 vs. 1,709.9 ± 525.9 W), mean propulsive force (2,183.2 ± 275.7 vs. 1,977.3 ± 215.5 N), and peak propulsive power (5,719.3 ± 699.3 vs. 5,139.9 ± 607.2 W). However, when expressed relative to body mass, no differences were observed in any of the aforementioned metrics, with no difference in jump height (37.3 ± 5.3 vs. 37.2 ± 4.8 cm) and reactive strength index-modified (0.554 ± 0.078 vs. 0.536 ± 0.099). In addition, time-to-takeoff, countermovement depth, and braking and propulsive phase durations were all similar in magnitude between the groups (d = 0.019–0.148), suggesting that both used similar jump strategies.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N