Comparison of hearing-aid effectiveness based on user-operated versus traditional audiometry: a randomised clinical trial.

Objective: To investigate whether hearing-aid fitting based on user-operated audiometry is non-inferior to hearing-aid fitting based on traditional audiometry. Design: This non-inferiority randomised clinical trial, took place at Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. In a first visit, partici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Audiology Vol. 65; no. 2; pp. 176 - 184
Autores principales: Pedersen, Carl, Pedersen, Ellen Raben, Laugesen, Søren, Sanchez-Lopez, Raul, Nielsen, Jacob, Sørensen, Chris Bang, Schmidt, Jesper Hvass
Formato: research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Feb2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=194088948&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 194088948
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14992027
        JW2
      jtl: International Journal of Audiology
      issn: 14992027
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2026
      vid: 65
      iid: 2
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        194088948
        181244510
        194088948
        194088948
        10.1080/14992027.2024.2434897
        194088948
      ppf: 176
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Comparison of hearing-aid effectiveness based on user-operated versus traditional audiometry: a randomised clinical trial.
      aug:
        au:
          Pedersen, Carl
          Pedersen, Ellen Raben
          Laugesen, Søren
          Sanchez-Lopez, Raul
          Nielsen, Jacob
          Sørensen, Chris Bang
          Schmidt, Jesper Hvass
        affil: Research Unit for ORL – Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
      sug:
        subj:
          Hearing Loss, Sensorineural Therapy
          Hearing Aid Fitting Methods
          Self Assessment
          Audiometry, Pure-Tone Methods
          Hearing Aids Evaluation
          Treatment Outcomes
          Human
          Equivalence Trials
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Random Assignment
          Male
          Female
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Funding Source
          Comparative Studies
          Academic Medical Centers
          Denmark
          Scales
          Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design
          Auditory Threshold
          Hearing
          Hearing Aids Utilization
          Prospective Studies
          Hearing Tests
          Auditory Acuity
          Persons with Hearing Disabilities
          Speech Perception
          Confidence Intervals
          Triple-Blind Studies
          Air Conduction
          Descriptive Statistics
          Data Analysis Software
          Mann-Whitney U Test
          Unpaired T-Tests
          Chi Square Test
          Consumers
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Objective: To investigate whether hearing-aid fitting based on user-operated audiometry is non-inferior to hearing-aid fitting based on traditional audiometry. Design: This non-inferiority randomised clinical trial, took place at Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. In a first visit, participants were tested with traditional audiometry as well as user-operated audiometry and filled in the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12) at baseline. Next, they were randomly divided to receive hearing aids fitted based on either the user-operated (UAud group) or the traditional audiometry (control group) hearing thresholds. After three months of hearing-aid use, participants underwent an aided hearing-in-noise test and completed the SSQ12 again, as well as an additional battery of outcome measures. Study sample: A total of 215 adults with sensorineural hearing impairment referred for bilateral hearing-aid fitting. Results: The before-after change in SSQ12 total scores was not different between the groups as the interaction between test times and groups was −0.06 (95% CI −0.56 to 0.44, p = 0.811). Conclusions: The findings suggest that the HA effectiveness in the UAud group was non-inferior to those observed in the control group. This implies that integrating user-operated audiometry into the clinical system is feasible, offering potential personnel time savings without compromising patient outcomes. Trial Registration: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05043207).
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N