A Diagnosis and Resolution to the Generality Problem.

The purpose of this paper is to offer a diagnosis and a resolution to generality problem. I state the generality problem and suggest a distinction between criteria of relevance and what I call a theory of determination. The generality problem may concern either of these. While plausible criteria of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Studies Vol. 127; no. 3; pp. 525 - 561
Autor principal: Kappel, Klemens
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Feb2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=19419886&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 19419886
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318116
        4L8
      jtl: Philosophical Studies
      issn: 00318116
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2006
      vid: 127
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        19419886
        10.1007/s11098-004-7805-2
      ppf: 525
      ppct: 36
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 214KB
      tig:
        atl: A Diagnosis and Resolution to the Generality Problem.
      aug:
        au: Kappel, Klemens
        affil: Department of Education, Philosophy and Rhetoric , University of Copenhagen , Njalsgade 80 2300 Copenhagen Denmark
      su:
        Determination (Personality trait)
        Personality
        Consciousness
        Theory of knowledge
        Relevance
        Meaning (Philosophy)
      sug:
        subj:
          Determination (Personality trait)
          Personality
          Consciousness
          Theory of knowledge
          Relevance
          Meaning (Philosophy)
      ab: The purpose of this paper is to offer a diagnosis and a resolution to generality problem. I state the generality problem and suggest a distinction between criteria of relevance and what I call a theory of determination. The generality problem may concern either of these. While plausible criteria of relevance would be convenient for the externalist, he does not need them. I discuss various theories of determination, and argue that no existing theory of determination is plausible. This provides a case for the no determination view: there are no facts that determine relevant types. This is the diagnosis of the generality problem. The externalist, however, may embrace the no determination view. This is what provides a resolution to the generality problem.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophical Studies is a copyright of Springer, 2006. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophical Studies
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2006
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N