Paradoxes versus Contradictions in Logic of Sentential Operators.

Classical logic, of first or higher order, is extended with sentential operators and quantifiers, interpreted substitutionally over unrestricted substitution class. Operators mark a single layered, consistent metalanguage. Self-reference, arising from substitutional quantification over sentences, al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Logic & Logical Philosophy Vol. 34; no. 4; pp. 631 - 675
Autor principal: Walicki, Michał
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Logic & Logical Philosophy Dec2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Classical logic, of first or higher order, is extended with sentential operators and quantifiers, interpreted substitutionally over unrestricted substitution class. Operators mark a single layered, consistent metalanguage. Self-reference, arising from substitutional quantification over sentences, allows to express paradoxes which, unlike contradictions, do not lead to explosion. Semantics of the resulting language, using semi-kernels of digraphs, is non-explosive yet two-valued and has classical semantics as a special case for clasically consistent theories. A complete reasoning is obtained by extending LK with two rules for sentential quantifiers. Adding (cut) yields a complete system for the explosive semantics.