Evaluation of three mechanical chest compression devices: a simulation-based mannequin study.

Introduction: High-quality chest compressions are essential when treating out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients but they may be compromised due to rescuer fatigue. Therefore, mechanical chest compression devices (MCCDS) are used, but the choice of device is a matter of debate. This study ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:British Paramedic Journal Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 5 - 17
Autores principales: Kjeldsen, Mads, Pedersen, Rune, Burholt, Peter Brian Madsen, Hald, Niels Ole Saaby, Bruun, Niels Henrik, Rasmussen, Bodil Steen, Gram, Jannie Kristine Bang, Klitgaard, Thomas Lass
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: College of Paramedics Jun2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=194277603&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 194277603
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14784726
        LFLE
      jtl: British Paramedic Journal
      issn: 14784726
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2026
      vid: 11
      iid: 1
      pid: 46865
      pub: College of Paramedics
    artinfo:
      ui:
        194277603
        194277603
        194277603
        10.29045/14784726.2026.6.11.1.5
        194277603
      ppf: 5
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Evaluation of three mechanical chest compression devices: a simulation-based mannequin study.
      aug:
        au:
          Kjeldsen, Mads
          Pedersen, Rune
          Burholt, Peter Brian Madsen
          Hald, Niels Ole Saaby
          Bruun, Niels Henrik
          Rasmussen, Bodil Steen
          Gram, Jannie Kristine Bang
          Klitgaard, Thomas Lass
        affil: Aalborg University, Denmark
      sug:
        subj:
          Simulations
          Resuscitation, Cardiopulmonary Equipment and Supplies
          Equipment Reliability Evaluation
          Heart Arrest Therapy
          Prehospital Care
          Human
          Funding Source
          Usability Study
          Prospective Studies
          Models, Anatomic
          Ambulances
          Movement
          Questionnaires
          Paramedics
          Transportation of Patients
          Attitude of Health Personnel
          Descriptive Statistics
          Post Hoc Analysis
          Adult
          Middle Age
          One-Way Analysis of Variance
          Kruskal-Wallis Test
          Data Analysis Software
          Scales
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
      ab: Introduction: High-quality chest compressions are essential when treating out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients but they may be compromised due to rescuer fatigue. Therefore, mechanical chest compression devices (MCCDS) are used, but the choice of device is a matter of debate. This study aimed to compare the quality of chest compressions along with usability of three commercially available devices. Methods: The study was prospectively designed and tested LUCAS 3, AutoPulse and Corpuls CPR on the AmbuMan Advanced simulation mannequin in four different scenarios, including mounting of device, patient transport via stairs and ambulance and re-packing. The quality of chest compressions was evaluated according to current guidelines, movement of the device and usability, through a predefined questionnaire. Results: In total, 45 paramedics and 40 pre-hospital clinicians were invited to participate in the study; nine paramedics took part. A significant difference in time regarding patient transport via stairs and re-packing was observed between the tested devices. Significant differences in ratings of MCCDs regarding unpacking, mounting and the start of mechanical chest compressions, as well as overall usability of and satisfaction with the devices, were observed. LUCAS 3 and Corpuls CPR had significantly higher mean proportions of compressions within the European Resuscitation Council's recommendations as compared to AutoPulse (post-hoc analysis). Most participants recommended Corpuls CPR for future use. Conclusion: In this simulation study of OHCA attended by paramedics using mechanical chest compressions on a mannequin, the LUCAS 3 and Corpuls CPR systems were overall superior to the AutoPulse system regarding quality of chest compressions during cardiac arrest as compared to current guidelines and usability. No ultimate distinction between LUCAS 3 and Corpuls CPR could be made.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N