Automated gait classification: Comparison of automated algorithms to expert classification.

Accurate classification of gait patterns in children with cerebral palsy (CP) is critical for guiding treatment but requires expert interpretation of data. Automated methods have potential to improve consistency and scalability; however, clinically meaningful automated tools are limited. This work a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Clinical Biomechanics Vol. 137
Autores principales: Kruger, Karen M., Krzak, Joseph J., Chafetz, Ross S., Sienko, Susan, Bauer, Jeremy P.
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Jul2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=194448645&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 194448645
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02680033
        JB1
      jtl: Clinical Biomechanics
      issn: 02680033
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2026
      vid: 137
      pid: 467
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        194448645
        194448645
        194448645
        10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2026.106864
        194448645
      ppct: 1
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Automated gait classification: Comparison of automated algorithms to expert classification.
      aug:
        au:
          Kruger, Karen M.
          Krzak, Joseph J.
          Chafetz, Ross S.
          Sienko, Susan
          Bauer, Jeremy P.
        affil: Shriners Children's Chicago, 2211 N. Oak Park Ave., Chicago, IL 60707, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Cerebral Palsy In Infancy and Childhood
          Gait Analysis Classification
          Algorithms Utilization
          Human
          Female
          Male
          Child
          Comparative Studies
          Quantitative Studies
          Interrater Reliability
          Data Analysis Software
          Descriptive Statistics
          Child: 6-12 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Accurate classification of gait patterns in children with cerebral palsy (CP) is critical for guiding treatment but requires expert interpretation of data. Automated methods have potential to improve consistency and scalability; however, clinically meaningful automated tools are limited. This work aimed to determine if automated algorithms based on established gait classifications can reproduce expert clinical classification in children with CP. An automated MATLAB algorithm was developed to assign gait classifications using two established systems (Rodda & Graham and Rozumalski & Schwartz). A sample of children with CP who met criteria for crouch gait underwent automated classification. Three expert gait analysts independently classified all trials using standardized definitions corresponding to each system. Fleiss's κ quantified inter-rater reliability, while Cohen's κ, weighted κ, percent agreement, and macro F1 scores quantified agreement between each reviewer and the automated classifications. Inter-rater reliability among reviewers was substantial for Rodda & Graham (κ = 0.753), with high agreement between reviewers. Inter-rater reliability among reviewers was moderate for Rozumalski & Schwartz (κ = 0.456) and agreement between raters was lower and more variable, with some classifications demonstrating full disagreement among reviewers. Automated gait classification based on quantitative gait criteria can achieve agreement with gait analysis experts for systems with clear biomechanical boundaries. More complex cluster–based systems yield lower agreement, reflecting inherent ambiguity in cluster overlap. These findings support use of automated tools as reliable, objective ground-truth for large-scale analyses and for training markerless or video-based assessment algorithms aimed at expanding gait evaluation beyond specialized motion laboratories. • There is a need for clinically meaningful automated gait classification tools. • Rodda & Graham reported almost perfect agreement with expert gait interpretation. • Cluster–based systems yield lower agreement, reflecting more overlap in clusters. • These methods can serve as objective ground truth for training of large-scale analyses.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N