Fraudulent qualitative study participants: experiences of two nurse researchers.

Why you should read this article: • To recognise the threat of fraudulent participation in nursing research • To read about the experiences of nurse researchers navigating qualitative interviews while suspecting participants were fraudulent • To learn about some red flags that may help identify pote...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Nurse Researcher Vol. 34; no. 2; pp. 35 - 43
Autores principales: Kittle, Jolene, Brown, Amanda
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom (The) Jun2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Why you should read this article: • To recognise the threat of fraudulent participation in nursing research • To read about the experiences of nurse researchers navigating qualitative interviews while suspecting participants were fraudulent • To learn about some red flags that may help identify potential fraudulent participants, and to explore strategies to mitigate fraudulent participation in your research. Background: Qualitative research enables the exploration of human experiences, supports theory development and reveals the reasons behind complex nursing phenomena. The shift to virtual data collection during the COVID-19 pandemic introduced challenges, particularly the rise of fraudulent study participants, that threaten data integrity. Aim: This report aims to raise awareness of the concept of fraudulent participation in qualitative research in the nursing discipline and discusses actions that qualitative researchers can take to reduce or eliminate recruitment and enrolment of fraudulent participants. Discussion: Through a case series presentation, nurse researchers share two experiences of managing fraudulent responses in qualitative research. Both studies encountered suspicious patterns, vague participant responses, repeated participation attempts and refusal to turn cameras on. In both studies, researchers lacked clear protocols to address fraud. Conclusion: Fraudulent participation highlights the need for standardised guidelines, proactive measures and institutional support to ensure research integrity in online qualitative nursing research. Implications for practice: Implementing standardised recruitment protocols and providing training for nurse researchers are important steps in detecting and preventing fraudulent participation in qualitative research. Additionally, developing ethical guidelines and fostering collaboration among researchers will improve the integrity and reliability of research findings.