Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Lives of Young Adults: Exploring Motivations and Mental Health.

Young people have rapidly adopted generative artificial intelligence (genAI) technology, yet little is known about how genAI use relates to mental health. This observational study examined associations between genAI use motivations—social-emotional support, task automation, learning/exploration, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Adolescent Health Vol. 79; no. 2; pp. 218 - 226
Autores principales: Maheux, Anne J., Maes, Chelly, Buck, Benjamin
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Aug2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=194733346&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 194733346
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        1054139X
        ILK
      jtl: Journal of Adolescent Health
      issn: 1054139X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2026
      vid: 79
      iid: 2
      pid: 467
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        194733346
        194733346
        194733346
        10.1016/j.jadohealth.2026.03.014
        194733346
      ppf: 218
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Lives of Young Adults: Exploring Motivations and Mental Health.
      aug:
        au:
          Maheux, Anne J.
          Maes, Chelly
          Buck, Benjamin
        affil: Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
      sug:
        subj:
          Artificial Intelligence, Generative Utilization
          Artificial Intelligence, Generative Utilization
          Motivation Evaluation
          Mental Disorders Symptoms
          Support, Psychosocial
          Dating
          Sexuality
          Internalizing Behavior
          Sociodemographic Factors
          Human
          Adolescence
          Adult
          Male
          Female
          United States
          Nonexperimental Studies
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Descriptive Statistics
          Models, Theoretical
          Sex Factors
          Race Factors
          Ethnic Groups
          Social Class
          Depression
          Anxiety
          Loneliness
          Mental Health
          Comparative Studies
          Automation
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Young people have rapidly adopted generative artificial intelligence (genAI) technology, yet little is known about how genAI use relates to mental health. This observational study examined associations between genAI use motivations—social-emotional support, task automation, learning/exploration, and dating/sexuality—and internalizing symptoms, as well as sociodemographic differences. U.S. young adults (N = 1003; ages 18–25; 56.3% women, 39.4% men, 4.3% another gender) completed a cross-sectional online survey. Path models tested associations between genAI motivations and mental health, with comparisons by gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES). Men, Black youth, and higher SES youth used genAI more and for more purposes. Using genAI for social-emotional support was linked to higher depressive (βs = 0.22–0.29; ps < 0.004) and anxiety symptoms (βs = 0.22–0.30; ps < 0.008), whereas using genAI for learning and exploration was associated with lower symptoms of depression (βs = −0.20 to −0.40; ps < 0.008), anxiety (βs = −0.26 to −0.26; ps < 0.003), and loneliness (βs = −0.28 to −0.42; ps < 0.001). Multiple group comparisons revealed gender-specific patterns: among women, task automation and dating/sexuality motivations were related to poorer mental health (βs = 0.12–0.19; ps < 0.05). Among men, social-emotional support motivations predicted greater loneliness (β = 0.33; p <.001). No significant moderation effects were observed by race/ethnicity or SES. Whereas learning/exploration may be adaptive, reliance on genAI for relational support may exacerbate (or reflect pre-existing) internalizing symptoms, with distinct vulnerabilities by gender. Longitudinal research is needed to clarify temporal pathways and inform interventions.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N