How Do Collaborative Approaches Shape Power Dynamics in Therapeutic Relationships? Evidence From Recovery‐Oriented Mental Health Services.

Introduction: Recovery‐oriented mental health services emphasise collaboration, empowerment and service‐user involvement. However, less is known about how power is enacted within relationships described as collaborative. This study explores how power dynamics are interactionally produced, negotiated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Health Expectations Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 1 - 17
Autores principales: Faccio, Elena, Rocelli, Michele, Binaggia, Lorenzo, Giolli, Elisa, Romaioli, Diego, Chiara, Giacomo, Agostini, Claudio, Vitelli, Roberto, Aquili, Ludovica
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jun2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=194811316&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 194811316
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13696513
        EVY
      jtl: Health Expectations
      issn: 13696513
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2026
      vid: 29
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        194811316
        194811316
        194811316
        10.1111/hex.70707
        194811316
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: How Do Collaborative Approaches Shape Power Dynamics in Therapeutic Relationships? Evidence From Recovery‐Oriented Mental Health Services.
      aug:
        au:
          Faccio, Elena
          Rocelli, Michele
          Binaggia, Lorenzo
          Giolli, Elisa
          Romaioli, Diego
          Chiara, Giacomo
          Agostini, Claudio
          Vitelli, Roberto
          Aquili, Ludovica
        affil: Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
      sug:
        subj:
          Mental Disorders Therapy
          Power
          Group Dynamics
          Therapeutic Alliance
          Recovery
          Mental Health Services
          Physician-Patient Relations
          Human
          Funding Source
          Italy
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Qualitative Studies
          Semi-Structured Interview
          Audiorecording
          Descriptive Statistics
          Thematic Analysis
          Interrater Reliability
          Social Dominance
          Narratives
          Professional Role
          Cooperative Behavior
          Patient Participation
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Introduction: Recovery‐oriented mental health services emphasise collaboration, empowerment and service‐user involvement. However, less is known about how power is enacted within relationships described as collaborative. This study explores how power dynamics are interactionally produced, negotiated and made visible within recovery‐oriented therapeutic relationships. Methods: The study involved 15 service users from an Italian recovery‐oriented mental health service and 15 facilitators identified by them as significant to their recovery. Data comprised 30 individual interviews and 15 dyadic interviews. Dyadic interviews served both to gather participants' accounts and to observe how the relationship was narratively enacted in interaction. Transcripts were analysed through a narrative‐interactional framework informed by Gubrium and Holstein's approach, with attention to narrative activation, composition, performance, collaboration and control. Coding focused on both what participants said about the relationship and how they co‐constructed, confirmed, redirected or constrained each other's narratives. Results: Four interpretive patterns were identified: parity‐oriented dynamics, declared parity with observed dominance, non‐categorizable dynamics, and acknowledged dominance. These patterns are better understood as heuristic configurations rather than definitive typologies. Parity‐oriented dyads were characterised by reciprocal narrative completion, mutual recognition and flexible turn‐taking. In other dyads, participants described the relationship as collaborative, while interaction showed more asymmetrical narrative control. One dyad displayed acknowledged directiveness, experienced by the service user as supportive rather than coercive. Across cases, professional role alone did not explain how power was enacted. Conclusion: Collaboration in recovery‐oriented relationships cannot be inferred from participants' declarations or professional role categories alone. Rather, it needs to be examined through the situated interactional practices by which participants make space for, limit, complete or authorise one another's accounts. The study contributes a qualitative framework for analysing power as a relational and negotiated process within therapeutic relationships. Patient or Public Contribution: Individuals with lived experience were actively involved in interpreting the research findings through discussion and feedback sessions. A final dissemination meeting with participants enabled the validation of these interpretations and contributed to concluding reflections on the practical implications for mental health services.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N