Corrigendum to: "The Protocol for Active Movement Extent Discrimination Assessment (AMEDA) Is Reliable when Shortened from 50 to 25 Stimuli to Reduce Testing Fatigue".
The article focuses on the reliability of the Protocol for Active Movement Extent Discrimination Assessment (AMEDA) when shortened from 50 to 25 stimuli to reduce testing fatigue. Following concerns raised on PubPeer about undeclared conflicts of interest and the accuracy of cited references, the au...
| Publicado en: | Perceptual & Motor Skills Vol. 133; no. 4; pp. 1218 - 1220 |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Correction Notice |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
Aug2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| Sumario: | The article focuses on the reliability of the Protocol for Active Movement Extent Discrimination Assessment (AMEDA) when shortened from 50 to 25 stimuli to reduce testing fatigue. Following concerns raised on PubPeer about undeclared conflicts of interest and the accuracy of cited references, the authors updated their disclosure to reveal that Professor Gordon Waddington is a founding shareholder in Prism Neuro Pty Ltd. Additionally, the second paragraph of the introduction was corrected to accurately reflect the supporting references regarding participant attention lapses in psychophysical research. These corrections were approved by the journal editor, and the authors issued an apology for the errors. |
|---|