Safeguarding Online Research in Eating Disorders Against Fraud: Increasing Risks and Practical Recommendations.

Objective: Recent growth of online research has been accompanied by an increase in reports of fraudulent participants, which can significantly comprise research validity. Drawing from our experience using Qualtrics with open recruitment, existing literature, and emerging studies in eating disorders...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Eating Disorders Vol. 59; no. 7; pp. 1451 - 1469
Autores principales: Pennesi, Jamie‐Lee, Pellizzer, Mia L., Wade, Tracey D.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jul2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=195039067&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 195039067
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02763478
        IJD
      jtl: International Journal of Eating Disorders
      issn: 02763478
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2026
      vid: 59
      iid: 7
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        195039067
        10.1002/eat.70083
      ppf: 1451
      ppct: 18
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Safeguarding Online Research in Eating Disorders Against Fraud: Increasing Risks and Practical Recommendations.
      aug:
        au:
          Pennesi, Jamie‐Lee
          Pellizzer, Mia L.
          Wade, Tracey D.
        affil: Flinders University Institute for Mental Health and Wellbeing and Blackbird Initiative, Flinders University, Adelaide South Australia, , Australia
      su:
        Consensus (Social sciences)
        Qualitative research
        Human research subjects
        Artificial intelligence
        Internet
        Eating disorders
        Medical research
        Fraud prevention
        Patient selection
        Research funding
        Surveys
        Acquisition of data
        Delphi method
        Data analysis software
      sug:
        subj:
          Consensus (Social sciences)
          Qualitative research
          Human research subjects
          Artificial intelligence
          Internet
          Eating disorders
          Medical research
          Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals
          Wired Telecommunications Carriers
          Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
          Fraud prevention
          Patient selection
          Research funding
          Surveys
          Acquisition of data
          Delphi method
          Data analysis software
      keyword:
        digital research
        eating disorders
        fraud
        fraudulent participants
        Internet research
        online research
        digital research
        eating disorders
        fraud
        fraudulent participants
        Internet research
        online research
      ab: Objective: Recent growth of online research has been accompanied by an increase in reports of fraudulent participants, which can significantly comprise research validity. Drawing from our experience using Qualtrics with open recruitment, existing literature, and emerging studies in eating disorders (ED), we outline the risk and provide simple, practical recommendations for preventing, detecting, and managing fraudulent participants in online ED research. Method: Over the conduct of a three‐round Delphi consensus study with 138 English‐speaking individuals aged 18 and older, we were inundated with fraudulent sign‐ups between July and August 2024, despite implementing multiple fraud prevention strategies. In response, we introduced additional fraud mitigation strategies and established a three‐step procedure for identifying and managing fraudulent participants. Results: The additional fraud mitigation measures, including a second reCAPTCHA, a duplicate question for consistency checks, and modified attention check questions, potentially aided in preventing further fraudulent sign‐ups. Our procedure involving manual comprehensive review of all incoming survey data and checks against a fraudulent participants' profile enabled us to identify and withdraw suspected or likely fraudulent participants. Discussion: With increasing fraudulent participation rates and rapidly advancing technological advancements such as artificial intelligence, all online studies are at risk and researchers need to be proactive in their use of antifraud practices to safeguard online research. Our practical recommendations can assist future researchers in managing fraudulent participants. Summary: Fraudulent participation in online research is rising rapidly and presents a significant threat to research integrity.All online studies are at risk and researchers must adopt proactive antifraud practices to safeguard data quality.We provide straightforward, practical recommendations for preventing, detecting, and managing fraudulent participation in online research.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N