The Persistence of the Ideological Lie: The Totalitarian Impulse Then and Now.

The article reviews Daniel J. Mahoney’s book *The Persistence of the Ideological Lie: The Totalitarian Impulse Then and Now*, which examines the nature of ideology as fundamentally rooted in falsehood and division, with a focus on its impact in contemporary American society. Mahoney critiques Marxis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Modern Age Vol. 68; no. 3; pp. 63 - 66
Autor principal: MeIonic, Emina
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Intercollegiate Studies Institute Summer2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=195121772&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 195121772
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00267457
        MOA
      jtl: Modern Age
      issn: 00267457
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Summer2026
      vid: 68
      iid: 3
      pid: 641
      pub: Intercollegiate Studies Institute
    artinfo:
      ui: 195121772
      ppf: 63
      ppct: 3
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 396KB
      tig:
        atl: The Persistence of the Ideological Lie: The Totalitarian Impulse Then and Now.
      aug:
        au: MeIonic, Emina
      sug:
      ab: The article reviews Daniel J. Mahoney’s book *The Persistence of the Ideological Lie: The Totalitarian Impulse Then and Now*, which examines the nature of ideology as fundamentally rooted in falsehood and division, with a focus on its impact in contemporary American society. Mahoney critiques Marxism and other ideologies for fostering conflict by categorizing people into groups defined by identity rather than actions, thereby undermining social cohesion. Drawing on thinkers such as Fyodor Dostoevsky, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, and Vaclav Havel, the book explores the spiritual and moral consequences of ideological totalitarianism, including nihilism and the erosion of human dignity. Mahoney argues that modern totalitarianism is "soft," operating through civil society and cultural institutions rather than overt state control, and emphasizes the ongoing responsibility of each generation to resist ideological deception by seeking truth beyond divisive narratives.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Modern Age is the property of Intercollegiate Studies Institute and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Modern Age
      holder: Intercollegiate Studies Institute
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2026
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N