Classification of High-Fatality Conflict Countries by Fragility Metrics.

Predicting the emergence of armed conflicts has long been a subject of debate in the social sciences. Numerous studies have shown that structural factors such as state capacity, economic fragility, and institutional inequality influence the risk of conflict. However, the predictive performance of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Itobiad: Journal of the Human & Social Science Researches / İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi Vol. 15; no. 2; pp. 924 - 946
Main Author: Akar, Çağlar
Format: Article
Published: Itobiad: Journal of the Human & Social Science Researches nissan-haziran2026
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=195132237&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 195132237
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        21471185
        GBL7
      jtl: Itobiad: Journal of the Human & Social Science Researches / İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi
      issn: 21471185
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: nissan-haziran2026
      vid: 15
      iid: 2
      pid: 87673
      pub: Itobiad: Journal of the Human & Social Science Researches
    artinfo:
      ui:
        195132237
        10.15869/itobiad.1716071
      ppf: 924
      ppct: 22
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Classification of High-Fatality Conflict Countries by Fragility Metrics.
      aug:
        au: Akar, Çağlar
        affil: Assistant Professor, Istanbul Okan University Vocational School, Istanbul, Türkiye.
      su:
        War casualties
        Fragile States Index
        Predictive validity
        Classification algorithms
      sug:
        subj:
          War casualties
          Fragile States Index
          Predictive validity
          Classification algorithms
      keyword:
        Armed Conflict
        Conflict Prediction
        Fragility
        Machine Learning
        Poverty
        Kırılganlık
        Makine Öğrenmesi
        Silahlı Çatışma
        Silahlı Çatışma Tahmini
        Yoksulluk
        Armed Conflict
        Conflict Prediction
        Fragility
        Machine Learning
        Poverty
        Kırılganlık
        Makine Öğrenmesi
        Silahlı Çatışma
        Silahlı Çatışma Tahmini
        Yoksulluk
      ab: Predicting the emergence of armed conflicts has long been a subject of debate in the social sciences. Numerous studies have shown that structural factors such as state capacity, economic fragility, and institutional inequality influence the risk of conflict. However, the predictive performance of these indicators is often not systematically tested. This study examines the ability of structural fragility indicators to distinguish periods of high-death-toll conflict within a prospective classification framework. The analysis combines structural indicators included in the Fragile States Index with death tolls derived from ACLED event data. The dependent variable is defined as a binary indicator of whether a country experiences at least 25 conflict-related deaths in the following year. To prevent temporal information leakage and obtain a more realistic assessment, a rolling prediction design with an expanding training window was employed instead of the random data-splitting method. The Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) algorithm, which has high capacity to capture nonlinear relationships, was preferred for classification. The findings indicate that structural fragility indicators exhibit strong discriminatory performance in identifying country-year observations that exceed the high-fatality threshold. The average ROC-AUC value in the rolling evaluation results is approximately 0.92. However, the prediction performance is not entirely constant over time. Limited weakening in both discriminatory power and probability calibration occurs in some periods. This indicates that structural indicators convey a significant signal of conflict risk, but predictive success is not independent of the temporal context. The study contributes to the conflict prediction literature by demonstrating that variables with strong explanatory power do not necessarily yield stable predictive performance over time.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N