Doctrine in the Third Drone Age: how NATO should adapt to full spectrum drone warfare.

We are entering a Third Drone Age, one characterized by full spectrum drone warfare (FSDW). FSDW is not one single technology in one domain, but a systems revolution of autonomous air, ground and maritime machines that learn, adapt, and fight as one. NATO members are noting this FSDW transformation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Affairs Vol. 102; no. 4; pp. 1415 - 1425
Autores principales: Rogers, James Patton, Kunertova, Dominika, Hutto, James Wesley, Redmond, Elizabeth H
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Jul2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=195222517&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 195222517
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00205850
        INA
      jtl: International Affairs
      issn: 00205850
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2026
      vid: 102
      iid: 4
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        195222517
        10.1093/ia/iiag092
      ppf: 1415
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Doctrine in the Third Drone Age: how NATO should adapt to full spectrum drone warfare.
      aug:
        au:
          Rogers, James Patton
          Kunertova, Dominika
          Hutto, James Wesley
          Redmond, Elizabeth H
        affil:
          Jeb E. Brooks School of Public Policy, Cornell University, 2201 Martha Van Rensselaer Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-0001, United States
          1) Harvard Kennedy School, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs 2) Peace Research Center Prague, Department of Social Sciences, Charles University
          School of Advanced Air and Space Studies, Air University, Maxwell AFB, Alabama, United States
          Cornell Tech Policy Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
      su:
        North Atlantic Treaty Organization
        Drone warfare
        Military doctrine
        Autonomous vehicles
        Military strategy
        Autonomous robots
        Military technology
        Interagency coordination
      sug:
        subj:
          North Atlantic Treaty Organization
          Drone warfare
          Military doctrine
          Autonomous vehicles
          Military strategy
          Autonomous robots
          Military technology
          Interagency coordination
      keyword:
        copyrightHolder:The Royal Institute of International Affairs
        copyrightYear:2026
        European security
        inLanguage:en
        international security
        military intervention
        publisher:Oxford University Press
        sameAs:https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiag092
        war
        copyrightHolder:The Royal Institute of International Affairs
        copyrightYear:2026
        European security
        inLanguage:en
        international security
        military intervention
        publisher:Oxford University Press
        sameAs:https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiag092
        war
      ab: We are entering a Third Drone Age, one characterized by full spectrum drone warfare (FSDW). FSDW is not one single technology in one domain, but a systems revolution of autonomous air, ground and maritime machines that learn, adapt, and fight as one. NATO members are noting this FSDW transformation and are heavily investing in unmanned systems across domains, yet without a shared framework for integrating them. The question is not whether to buy drones to strengthen NATO's deterrence posture and strategic autonomy, but whether NATO members can build the doctrine, software, supply-chain and allied institutional capacity to deploy them more effectively than their adversaries. Put simply, mass alone is not an effective strategy, and a doctrinal shift is needed. This policy paper identifies two major variables that will determine whether FSDW will deliver military advantage in future wars: mature cross-domain unmanned teaming and effective doctrinal adaptation. States that achieve both technological and institutional change gain decisive operational advantages. Those that simply accumulate platforms without updating doctrine risk spending heavily while falling behind. Combining these variables produces four possible futures for NATO out to 2040, from full FSDW integration to platform stagnation. The most pressing risk is technology without strategy—a scenario where mature hardware is paired with outdated doctrine.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N