Interaction Between Head Movement Behavior and Simulated Spatial Filtering: Comparing Free Conversation and Speech Tests in Virtual Reality.

The benefit provided by hearing devices often differs between laboratory evaluations and real-world conditions, due to low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in adaptive speech tests and differences in head movement behavior between laboratory evaluations and real conversations. This study aimed to investi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Trends in Hearing Vol. 30; pp. 1 - 18
Autores principales: Grimm, Giso, Kothe, Angelika, Hohmann, Volker
Formato: equations & formulas pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. 7/8/2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=195272838&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 195272838
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        23312165
        HCEJ
      jtl: Trends in Hearing
      issn: 23312165
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 7/8/2026
      vid: 30
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        195272838
        195272838
        195272838
        10.1177/23312165261465698
        195272838
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 17
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Interaction Between Head Movement Behavior and Simulated Spatial Filtering: Comparing Free Conversation and Speech Tests in Virtual Reality.
      aug:
        au:
          Grimm, Giso
          Kothe, Angelika
          Hohmann, Volker
        affil: Auditory Signal Processing and Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all", Department of Medical Physics and Acoustics, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
      sug:
        subj:
          Spatial Perception Evaluation
          Audiometry, Speech
          Movement
          Head Physiology
          Hearing Aids
          Noise Adverse Effects
          Sound Localization
          Speech Perception Evaluation
          Virtual Reality
          Conversation
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Funding Source
          Comparative Studies
          Acoustic Stimulation
          Speech Acoustics
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Speech Discrimination Tests
          Speech Reception Threshold Test
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Speech Intelligibility
          Repeated Measures
          Analysis of Variance
          T-Tests
          Post Hoc Analysis
          Descriptive Statistics
          Data Analysis Software
          Language
          Nonparametric Statistics
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: The benefit provided by hearing devices often differs between laboratory evaluations and real-world conditions, due to low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in adaptive speech tests and differences in head movement behavior between laboratory evaluations and real conversations. This study aimed to investigate whether SNR improvement provided by a spatial filter can be measured during free conversation in virtual reality (VR) and to compare this SNR improvement with the benefit measured using a speech test with two spatially separated talkers in the same VR. Two experimental conditions were tested in 11 normal-hearing participants. Condition 1 involved free conversations between a participant and two confederates represented by avatars, and Condition 2 utilized an adaptive speech test with two speakers, presented by the same avatars. Acoustic simulations were used to render speech signals, background noise and room acoustics. A spatial filter with two levels of selectivity was simulated in VR using the participant's actual dynamic head orientation. Acoustic measures of the benefit of the spatial filter were derived from these simulated signals. The benefit was higher when measured in free conversations than in the speech test. Additionally, participants were found to move their heads closer to active speakers during free conversation than during the speech test. Furthermore, SNR in free conversations was closer to SNRs typical of conversational environments. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of hearing devices can be evaluated through conversations in VR at more realistic SNRs. Consequently, this approach may improve the ecological validity of hearing aid research outcomes.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        equations & formulas
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N