Refining prognosis in advanced renal cell carcinoma: international real-world validation of the Meet-URO score in first-line immunotherapy combinations.

Background Effective risk stratification is essential for guiding treatment decisions in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The Meet-URO score is a novel prognostic model that integrates the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria with neutrophil-to-lympho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Oncologist Vol. 31; no. 7; pp. 1 - 12
Autores principales: Rebuzzi, Sara Elena, Ghose, Aruni, Rudman, Sarah, Venugopal, Balaji, Young, Kate, Frazer, Ricky Dylan, Ayodele, Olubukola, Stares, Mark, O'Carrigan, Brent, Ali, Waqas
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Jul2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=195281659&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 195281659
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10837159
        IJ7
      jtl: Oncologist
      issn: 10837159
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2026
      vid: 31
      iid: 7
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        195281659
        195281659
        197171167
        195281659
        10.1093/oncolo/oyag203
        195281659
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 11
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Refining prognosis in advanced renal cell carcinoma: international real-world validation of the Meet-URO score in first-line immunotherapy combinations.
      aug:
        au:
          Rebuzzi, Sara Elena
          Ghose, Aruni
          Rudman, Sarah
          Venugopal, Balaji
          Young, Kate
          Frazer, Ricky Dylan
          Ayodele, Olubukola
          Stares, Mark
          O'Carrigan, Brent
          Ali, Waqas
        affil: Medical Oncology Unit 2, Ospedale Molinette, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, 10126, Italy
      sug:
        subj:
          Carcinoma, Renal Cell Drug Therapy
          Carcinoma, Renal Cell Prognosis
          Neoplasm Metastasis Prognosis
          Immunotherapy Methods
          Antineoplastic Agents, Combined Therapeutic Use
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Multicenter Studies
          Retrospective Design
          Record Review
          Nonexperimental Studies
          Survival Analysis
          Overall Survival
          Progression-Free Survival
          Validation Studies
          Karnofsky Performance Status
          Hemoglobins
          Calcium
          Albumins
          Neutrophils
          Platelet Count
          Kaplan-Meier Estimator
          Log-Rank Test
          Confidence Intervals
          Odds Ratio
          Logistic Regression
          Multivariate Analysis
          Cox Proportional Hazards Model
          Data Analysis Software
          Descriptive Statistics
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background Effective risk stratification is essential for guiding treatment decisions in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The Meet-URO score is a novel prognostic model that integrates the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the presence of bone metastases. Developed in the immunotherapy era, it has demonstrated superior prognostic accuracy compared to the IMDC score across various clinical settings and treatment strategies. Its validation in the context of first-line immune-based combinations has been awaited. Methods External validation of Meet-URO was performed using a large retrospective real-world cohort of mRCC patients treated with first-line immune-based combinations. Secondary analyses included a comparison with the IMDC score for predicting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Additionally, restricted mean survival time (RMST) was assessed. Results A total of 1,418 patients were included in the analysis: 54% received ICI–ICI regimen (nivolumab plus ipilimumab), while 46% received the ICI–TKI combination. At baseline, 52.5% of patients had an NLR ≥ 3.2, and 32% had bone metastases. After a median follow-up of 26.8 months, the median OS and median PFS were 34.7 and 11.3 months, respectively. Meet-URO demonstrated effective prognostic stratification, identifying patient groups with markedly different outcomes (median OS 11.5-51.4 months; 3-year OS 26-66%; RMST 20.0-42.8 months). Compared to IMDC, Meet-URO showed a significantly better OS (c-index 0.675 vs 0.643; Δc = 0.032, P  < .001) and PFS (c-index 0.60 vs 0.58; P  < .001) prediction performance. Conclusions Meet-URO demonstrated robust prognostic accuracy. Its integration into routine clinical practice and use as a stratification factor in clinical trials may support more personalized treatment strategies and enhance clinical trial design.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N