Ethical tensions in legally mandated substance use treatment: A scoping review of participant perspectives.

Background and aims: Mandating people charged with drug‐related criminal offenses to participate in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment as an alternative to jail time is a policy with widespread political and public support in the United States; however, mandated treatment programs present a tens...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Addiction Vol. 121; no. 8; pp. 1972 - 1982
Autores principales: Taylor, Jirka, Jamakandi, Shriya, Saloner, Brendan
Formato: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Aug2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=195313913&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 195313913
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09652140
        AIO
      jtl: Addiction
      issn: 09652140
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2026
      vid: 121
      iid: 8
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        195313913
        192428462
        195313913
        195313913
        10.1111/add.70394
        195313913
      ppf: 1972
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Ethical tensions in legally mandated substance use treatment: A scoping review of participant perspectives.
      aug:
        au:
          Taylor, Jirka
          Jamakandi, Shriya
          Saloner, Brendan
        affil: Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD,, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Substance Use Disorders Therapy
          Research Subjects Ethical Issues
          Research Subjects Psychosocial Factors
          Human United States
          Scoping Review
          Funding Source
          Medline
          Descriptive Statistics
          United States
      ab: Background and aims: Mandating people charged with drug‐related criminal offenses to participate in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment as an alternative to jail time is a policy with widespread political and public support in the United States; however, mandated treatment programs present a tension between competing ethical values (e.g. autonomy versus protection from harm). To help ground the ethical discussion, this paper examined qualitative literature on mandated treatment programs that explores these ethical tensions from the perspective of program participants. Methods: We undertook a review of studies reporting views of individual participants on their experiences in a mandated treatment program. Scope of search was limited to the United States, and only literature pertaining to substance use treatment mandated by the criminal legal system was considered. In total, 39 studies were included in the review. Results: Participants' perspectives reported in the literature attest to the existence of the following five tension points: (1) choice about whether to participate in a program, (2) choice about what services are provided during mandated treatment, (3) perceived conflicts of interest among treatment providers, (4) involvement of judges or other criminal legal officials in treatment decisions, and (5) targeting of people who are not in need of treatment. People subjected to mandates often experience these same tensions, but their overall appraisal of their experience often depends on unique contextual factors that vary substantially based on the implementation of programs in real world conditions. Many participants felt that programs such as drug court provide a necessary nudge without overly restricting their autonomy, but others revealed more ambivalent or negative attitudes. Conclusions: The widely varying experiences of people in the United States participating in mandated substance use disorder treatment programs underscore the difficulty of rendering sweeping conclusions about the benefits and harms of mandated treatment and highlight the need to calibrate programs and policies to meet the specific needs and interests of different groups facing mandates.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N