Development of a Deep Learning Model for Automated Measurement of Skeletal Muscle Volume in 18F-FDG PET/CT.

To develop a deep learning–based automated trunk muscle volumetry method using whole-body CT from PET/CT and evaluate its performance against bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). In this retrospective study, an nnU-Net–based segmentation model was developed using a three-step iterative refinement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine pp. 1 - 10
Autores principales: Nakamoto, Ryusuke, Fujimoto, Koji, Sakamoto, Ryo, Yakami, Masahiro, Nobashi, Tomomi W., Isoda, Hiroyoshi, Kataoka, Masako, Nakamoto, Yuji
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Jul2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:To develop a deep learning–based automated trunk muscle volumetry method using whole-body CT from PET/CT and evaluate its performance against bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). In this retrospective study, an nnU-Net–based segmentation model was developed using a three-step iterative refinement strategy with 20 manually annotated datasets. Trunk muscles were segmented in 209 individuals (median age 52 years, IQR 47–60.3; 148 men) undergoing PET/CT and BIA. Model performance was validated using Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs). Pearson’s correlation coefficients (<italic>r</italic>) compared BIA-derived trunk muscle mass with that estimated by automated 3D volume or conventional 2D L3 cross-sectional area (CSA). Williams’ t test compared dependent correlations. The segmentation model achieved a DSC of 0.991. Automated 3D muscle volume demonstrated a significantly stronger correlation with BIA-derived mass (<italic>r</italic> = 0.961; 95% CI: 0.948, 0.970) compared to 2D L3-CSA (<italic>r</italic> = 0.912; 95% CI: 0.886, 0.933; <italic>P</italic> < 0.001). While 3D volumetry maintained high correlations in both sexes (<italic>r</italic> = 0.898 for both), 2D L3-CSA showed significantly reduced performance in men (<italic>r</italic> = 0.757; <italic>P</italic> < 0.001 vs. 3D). Automated 3D volumetry provides a significantly more robust assessment of muscle mass than conventional 2D metrics by capturing whole-trunk anatomical variations. This framework enables accurate, scalable body composition analysis directly from routine PET/CT workflows without additional radiation.