Virtual vs. In-Person Training for MinMed™ 780G Initiation: Comparable Effectiveness and Safety in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.

Background: A knowledge gap persists regarding whether virtual training differs from in-person training in terms of metabolic control and clinical safety among adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) initiating the MiniMed™ 780G advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) system. Methods: Observational st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology & Diabetes Vol. 19; pp. 1 - 11
Autores principales: Gómez, Ana Maria, Henao-Carrillo, Diana, Muñoz-Velandia, Oscar, Mina, Miguel Angel, Bermont, Paula Andrea
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. 7/20/2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=195525034&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 195525034
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        11795514
        B3KQ
      jtl: Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology & Diabetes
      issn: 11795514
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 7/20/2026
      vid: 19
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        195525034
        195525034
        195525034
        10.1177/11795514261471612
        195525034
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Virtual vs. In-Person Training for MinMed™ 780G Initiation: Comparable Effectiveness and Safety in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.
      aug:
        au:
          Gómez, Ana Maria
          Henao-Carrillo, Diana
          Muñoz-Velandia, Oscar
          Mina, Miguel Angel
          Bermont, Paula Andrea
        affil: Endocrinology Unit, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
      sug:
        subj:
          Insulin Infusion Systems Education
          Patient Education Methods
          Online Education
          Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring Education
          Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 Therapy
          Outcomes of Education Evaluation
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Nonexperimental Studies
          Comparative Studies
          Retrospective Design
          Record Review
          Prospective Studies
          Descriptive Statistics
          Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
          Chi Square Test
          Fisher's Exact Test
          Paired T-Tests
          Repeated Measures
          Logistic Regression
          Data Analysis Software
          Confidence Intervals
          Odds Ratio
          Hypoglycemia Prevention and Control
          Blood Glucose Analysis
          Age Factors
          Social Class
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: A knowledge gap persists regarding whether virtual training differs from in-person training in terms of metabolic control and clinical safety among adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) initiating the MiniMed™ 780G advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) system. Methods: Observational study comparing two retrospective cohorts of adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) treated with the Medtronic MiniMed™780G hybrid closed-loop insulin automation system: one cohort trained in-person and a second cohort trained virtually at the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá (Colombia). Metabolic control and safety parameters were evaluated 12 weeks after training initiation. A logistic regression model was developed to identify factors associated with meeting glycemic target (Time in range 70–180 mg/dL ≥ 70%) at 12 weeks. Results: 191 patients were analyzed; (49.7% virtual 50.3% in-person training). After 12 weeks, no statistically significant differences were observed in TIR between the cohorts (75% vs. 77.5%, p = 0.51). Severe hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL) decreased significantly in both groups (p<0.02), without differences between cohorts. The type of training was not significantly associated with achieving the goals of TIR (adjusted OR 0.78; 95% CI:0.16–3.82; p=0.76). Younger age (<45 years) was independently associated with improved metabolic control (adjusted OR 0.08; 95% CI:0.01–0.75; p=0.02). Higher socioeconomic status showed a trend toward better outcomes (adjusted OR 35.04; 95% CI:0.94–1260.6; p=0.05). Conclusions: Both virtual and in-person training are effective and safe strategies for initiating the MiniMed™ 780G AHCL system in adults with T1D, with no significant differences between training modalities.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N