Cost-Effectiveness of olaparib plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab monotherapy as first-line maintenance for patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a analysis from a Chinese healthcare perspective.

Objective: The PAOLA-1 trial demonstrated that olaparib plus bevacizumab (OB) significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to bevacizumab monotherapy (BM) as first-line maintenance therapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) who had homologou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:DARU: Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Vol. 34; no. 2; pp. 1 - 14
Autores principales: Cai, Pengxiang, Liu, Jin, Yu, Caifen, Chen, Qing, Huang, Shan, Zeng, Lingjun, Sun, Yong, Huang, Aiwen
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature 7/22/2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=195542257&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 195542257
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15608115
        8WS
      jtl: DARU: Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
      issn: 15608115
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 7/22/2026
      vid: 34
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        195542257
        195542257
        195542257
        10.1007/s40199-026-00621-1
        195542257
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 13
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Cost-Effectiveness of olaparib plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab monotherapy as first-line maintenance for patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a analysis from a Chinese healthcare perspective.
      aug:
        au:
          Cai, Pengxiang
          Liu, Jin
          Yu, Caifen
          Chen, Qing
          Huang, Shan
          Zeng, Lingjun
          Sun, Yong
          Huang, Aiwen
        affil: https://ror.org/05n0qbd70 Fuzong Teaching Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 900th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force, Fuzhou, China
      sug:
        subj:
          Cost Benefit Analysis
          Bevacizumab Therapeutic Use
          Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors Therapeutic Use
          Ovarian Neoplasms Drug Therapy
          Ovarian Neoplasms Economics
          Disease Progression Risk Factors
          Risk Assessment
          Health Systems Agencies China
          Human
          China
          Female
          Middle Age
          Secondary Analysis
          Descriptive Statistics
          Kaplan-Meier Estimator
          Parametric Statistics
          Post Hoc Analysis
          Overall Survival
          Progression-Free Survival
          Hidden Markov Models
          Quality-Adjusted Life Years
          Breast Neoplasms
          Disease Susceptibility
          Genes, BRCA
          Mutation
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
      ab: Objective: The PAOLA-1 trial demonstrated that olaparib plus bevacizumab (OB) significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to bevacizumab monotherapy (BM) as first-line maintenance therapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) who had homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive status at high risk of disease progression (HRisk-HRD+), including both the breast cancer susceptibility gene mutated (BRCAm) subgroup and the BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt) subgroup. This study aimed to assess its cost-effectiveness from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Methods: A state-transition Markov model over a 20-year lifetime horizon was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of OB compared to BM. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds were set at 1 to 3 times the gross domestic product per capita of China in 2024 ($13444.68 to $40334.05/QALY). The primary outcomes included total costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses were performed to validate the robustness of the study. Results: Compared with BM, the ICERs of OB were $10806.70/QALY, $10478.80/QALY and $25114.44/QALY in the HRisk-HRD+ population, BRCAm subgroup and BRCAwt subgroup, respectively. OB demonstrated potential cost-effectiveness for patients with HRisk-HRD+ AOC, particularly those with a BRCA mutation. One-way sensitivity analysis indicated that the discount rate and the price of olaparib were the primary factors influencing the ICER. The results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were generally consistent with those of the base-case analysis. Conclusions: Compared to BM, OB demonstrated superior cost-effectiveness as first-line maintenance therapy for patients with HRisk-HRD+ AOC, particularly those with a BRCA mutation in China.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N