Factors of social tension in the provinces of the Russian Empire in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

The key question of the economic and social post-reform history of Russia (after the agrarian reform of 1861) is what exactly led to the revolutions of the early 20th century. Were these revolutions a natural result of the growth of social tensions due to the flawed 'Prussian path' of the developmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Cambridge Journal of Economics Vol. 50; no. 4; pp. 673 - 712
Autores principales: Popov, Vladimir, Konchakov, Roman, Didenko, Dmitry
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Jul2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=195714138&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 195714138
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0309166X
        CEC
      jtl: Cambridge Journal of Economics
      issn: 0309166X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2026
      vid: 50
      iid: 4
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        195714138
        10.1093/cje/beag021
      ppf: 673
      ppct: 39
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Factors of social tension in the provinces of the Russian Empire in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
      aug:
        au:
          Popov, Vladimir
          Konchakov, Roman
          Didenko, Dmitry
        affil: RANEPA (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration), Russia
      su:
        Russia
        Land reform
        Land tenure
        Imperialism
        Social conflict
        Violence
        Twentieth century
        Russian Revolution, 1905-1907
        Nineteenth century
      sug:
        subj:
          Land reform
          Land tenure
          Imperialism
          Social conflict
          Violence
          Russia
          Lessors of Other Real Estate Property
          Twentieth century
          Russian Revolution, 1905-1907
          Nineteenth century
      keyword:
        copyrightHolder:Cambridge Political Economy Society
        copyrightYear:2026
        human capital
        inequality
        inLanguage:en
        land distribution
        publisher:Oxford University Press
        Russian revolutions
        sameAs:https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/beag021
        copyrightHolder:Cambridge Political Economy Society
        copyrightYear:2026
        human capital
        inequality
        inLanguage:en
        land distribution
        publisher:Oxford University Press
        Russian revolutions
        sameAs:https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/beag021
      ab: The key question of the economic and social post-reform history of Russia (after the agrarian reform of 1861) is what exactly led to the revolutions of the early 20th century. Were these revolutions a natural result of the growth of social tensions due to the flawed 'Prussian path' of the development of capitalism in agriculture (a combination of large landlords' estates and small land ownership of the bulk of the peasants) or did Russian capitalism develop successfully on the whole, and the revolutions were by no means inevitable, but rather caused by random, transient factors (war, political mistakes of the authorities and the opposition, etc.)— a brief overview of these discussions is in Nefedov and Ellman (2016). This paper aims to contribute to this discussion by analysing the patterns and causes of social protest (peasants' unrests, strikes at industrial enterprises, crimes against persons). We compute the index of inequality of land distribution for the Russian provinces, and find that the greatest increase of social protest before the First Russian Revolution of 1905–7, from the 1890s to the early 1900s, occurred in provinces with the most uneven land distribution. We speculate that this could have constituted one of the unique features of Russian development—it was the only state that experienced such a rapid territorial expansion in the era of serfdom with the result of developing extremely high land distribution inequalities in the new provinces, higher than in other European countries at the same time.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N