Civil Liability for Damages Arising from the Use of Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study between Islamic Jurisprudence and Positive Law.
This research attempts to elucidate the extent of civil responsibility for damages by artificial intelligence (AI), directly or indirectly. It investigates the legal capacity of AI and its characterization within jurisprudence, preparatory to establishing how its damage should be determined, and by...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Human Security (Librello Publishing House) Vol. 21; no. 2; pp. 47 - 52 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Librello Publishing House
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=195826131&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 195826131 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 18353800 ESYK jtl: Journal of Human Security (Librello Publishing House) issn: 18353800 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2025 vid: 21 iid: 2 pid: 83753 pub: Librello Publishing House artinfo: ui: 195826131 10.12924/johs2025.210207 ppf: 47 ppct: 5 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 618KB tig: atl: Civil Liability for Damages Arising from the Use of Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study between Islamic Jurisprudence and Positive Law. aug: au: Hassouneh, Aref Izzeddin Al-Amayreh, Abeer affil: Prof, Department of Fiqh and its origins, Faculty of Sharia, university of Jordan, Jordan-Amman Dr, Department of law, College of Law, Zarqa University, Jordan-Amman su: Artificial intelligence Civil liability Legal procedure Responsibility Comparative studies Islamic law Capacity (Law) Damages (Law) sug: subj: Artificial intelligence Civil liability Legal procedure Responsibility Comparative studies Islamic law Capacity (Law) Damages (Law) keyword: analogy of branches upon branches artificial intelligence Legal capacity liability for harm analogy of branches upon branches artificial intelligence Legal capacity liability for harm ab: This research attempts to elucidate the extent of civil responsibility for damages by artificial intelligence (AI), directly or indirectly. It investigates the legal capacity of AI and its characterization within jurisprudence, preparatory to establishing how its damage should be determined, and by whom. The discussion considers various possible legal perceptions of AI, as a juridical persona, a mere machine, or like an irrational animal, within both Islamic jurisprudence and positive law. The research utilized an analytical approach by integration of induction, interpretation, reasoning, and critique. The research results showed that, within the realm of Islamic jurisprudence, the majority opinion holds that AI has no legal personality and should be considered similarly to irrational animals with regards to responsibility. Under positive law, the same is most likely to hold, unless the state steps in and gives AI juridical personality, whereby rules of liability and guarantor will then respectively follow. The research advises against the formation of specific standards for redefining responsibility with regards to AI, with stress on the necessity of specific details owing to the characteristics of AI, whereby defects, errors, and linkages to damage cause difficulty. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|