Sequential reaching in older adults: vibrotactile feedback improves preparation and movement control.

Introduction: Age-related motor decline is particularly evident during complex movements that require sequencing and bimanual coordination. The one-target advantage (OTA), in which single-target movements are typically initiated faster than the first segment of a two-target sequence, provides a usef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience pp. 1 - 14
Autores principales: Mohammadalinezhad Kolahdouz, Saba, Malone, Quinn, Passmore, Steven R., Marotta, Jonathan J., Glazebrook, Cheryl M.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=195838191&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 195838191
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        16634365
        BG2U
      jtl: Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
      issn: 16634365
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2026
      pid: 40038
      pub: Frontiers Media S.A.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        195838191
        195838191
        195838191
        10.3389/fnagi.2026.1840948
        195838191
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 13
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Sequential reaching in older adults: vibrotactile feedback improves preparation and movement control.
      aug:
        au:
          Mohammadalinezhad Kolahdouz, Saba
          Malone, Quinn
          Passmore, Steven R.
          Marotta, Jonathan J.
          Glazebrook, Cheryl M.
        affil: Perceptual Motor Integration Lab, Applied Health Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Psychomotor Performance Evaluation
          Movement Evaluation
          Feedback Methods
          Vibration Therapeutic Use
          Task Performance and Analysis Evaluation
          Task Performance and Analysis Evaluation
          Human
          Funding Source
          Female
          Male
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Descriptive Statistics
          Reaction Time
          Motor Activity
          Aging
          Touch
          Acoustic Stimulation
          Range of Motion
          Kinematics
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Inferential Statistics
          Analysis of Variance
          Repeated Measures
          Data Analysis Software
          Post Hoc Analysis
          Power Analysis
          Experimental Studies
          Motion Capture
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Introduction: Age-related motor decline is particularly evident during complex movements that require sequencing and bimanual coordination. The one-target advantage (OTA), in which single-target movements are typically initiated faster than the first segment of a two-target sequence, provides a useful framework for assessing planning demands in older adults. Methods: We examined whether task complexity and brief auditory or vibrotactile feedback delivered at the first target contact influence sequential reaching performance in 24 older adults (67.46 ± 5.41 years). Participants completed one- and two-target reaching tasks under three feedback conditions (no feedback, auditory feedback, or vibrotactile feedback) across movement types varying in complexity, including extension, reversal, unimanual, and bimanual movement sequences. Outcome measures included movement preparation, movement execution, movement transitions, kinematic measures, and endpoint accuracy. Results: Vibrotactile feedback selectively improved performance by shortening reaction time in the unimanual extension task relative to one-target movements, effectively reversing the typical OTA pattern. Vibrotactile feedback also increased peak velocity and altered kinematic control during the second movement segment. In contrast, movement time to the first target remained unchanged, whereas movement time to the second target increased with task complexity and was longest during bimanual conditions. Endpoint accuracy and consistency remained stable across feedback and task conditions, indicating that the kinematic benefits of vibrotactile feedback did not occur at the expense of either endpoint accuracy or endpoint consistency. Discussion: Overall, brief vibrotactile cues enhanced movement preparation and kinematic control in older adults during sequential reaching, particularly under higher coordination demands.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N