Bridging Diffusion of Innovation and CNS Practice Frameworks Using Digital Chest Drainage: A Clinical Exemplar.

Objective: This article reconciles the NACNS practice domains framework to the Integrative Model of innovation diffusion to demonstrate how Clinical Nurse Specialists exercise their unique practice competencies to overcome technological, social, and learning environment barriers to knowledge transla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Clinical Nurse Specialist: The Journal for Advanced Nursing Practice Vol. 40; no. 5; pp. 178 - 186
Autores principales: Picard, Christopher, Rebello, Lyndon, Demmy, Jaquelynne, Picard, Kelly, Kruger, Calvin, Grewal, Angie, O'Dochartaigh, Domhnall, Douma, Matthew J., Middleton, Stacey, Norris, Colleen M., Montgomery, Carmel, Kim, Dennis, Culp, Greg
Formato: pictorial tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Sep2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: This article reconciles the NACNS practice domains framework to the Integrative Model of innovation diffusion to demonstrate how Clinical Nurse Specialists exercise their unique practice competencies to overcome technological, social, and learning environment barriers to knowledge translation using digital chest systems as a clinical exemplar. Description: A narrative synthesis of evidence from surgical and emerging nonsurgical literature was conducted. The National Association of Clinical Nurse Specialists (NACNS) competencies were compared with the Integrative Model domains—technology, social structure, and learning conditions. Key factors examined included evidence of clinical benefit, nurse and physician preferences, health system cost implications, and knowledge translation gaps. Outcome: We used the NACNS competency and integrated model of knowledge translation frameworks to examine digital drainage systems, which demonstrate clear clinical and operational advantages. We identified that digital chest drainage adoption in trauma is limited by entrenched orientations toward analog systems, weak social contagion, educational barriers, and inadequate marketing. Social factors, particularly peer influence and the need for local evidence, outweigh technological complexity in limiting diffusion. Conclusions: Technology-focused approaches alone are insufficient for widespread implementation of digital chest drainage in trauma care. Effective implementation strategies should prioritize clinician engagement, social learning, and systems-level value. Addressing siloed innovation through targeted knowledge translation strategies can bring high-performing technologies such as digital chest drainage into broader trauma care practice.