Probing the Imaginable: Shared and Distinct Processes Between Imagery and Perception Across Semantic Domains.

Our ability to visualize things outside our field of view often feels similar to visual perception. However, while perception is grounded in real-world sensory inputs, imagery might rely on information stored in long-term memory. This contrast raises key questions about the nature of these processes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Imagination, Cognition & Personality Vol. 46; no. 1; pp. 6 - 39
Main Authors: Liu, Zixin, Song, Tengyu, Lambert, Chloe Jeanne, Chang, Kassey, Chuaqui, Kezia, Baer, Natalie, Frank, Rachel, Liu, Jianghao, Bartolomeo, Paolo, Spagna, Alfredo
Format: research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Sage Publications Inc. Sep2026
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=195957956&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 195957956
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02762366
        E6E
      jtl: Imagination, Cognition & Personality
      issn: 02762366
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2026
      vid: 46
      iid: 1
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        195957956
        188699874
        195957956
        195957956
        10.1177/02762366251382836
        195957956
      ppf: 6
      ppct: 33
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Probing the Imaginable: Shared and Distinct Processes Between Imagery and Perception Across Semantic Domains.
      aug:
        au:
          Liu, Zixin
          Song, Tengyu
          Lambert, Chloe Jeanne
          Chang, Kassey
          Chuaqui, Kezia
          Baer, Natalie
          Frank, Rachel
          Liu, Jianghao
          Bartolomeo, Paolo
          Spagna, Alfredo
        affil: Department of Human Development, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Guided Imagery
          Semantics
          Visual Perception
          Brain Physiology
          Human
          Color
          Face Perception
          Maps
          Confidence
          Descriptive Statistics
          Logistic Regression
          Cluster Analysis
          Auditory Cortex
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Questionnaires
          Neural Pathways
      ab: Our ability to visualize things outside our field of view often feels similar to visual perception. However, while perception is grounded in real-world sensory inputs, imagery might rely on information stored in long-term memory. This contrast raises key questions about the nature of these processes: Do visual mental imagery and visual perception depend on distinct neural mechanisms? Or do they share access to a common representational space, which encodes semantic content in a way capable of supporting both internally generated images and externally driven perception? To what extent are individual differences in imagery vividness related to behavioral performance? To answer these questions, we developed a computerized battery eliciting visual perception and visual mental imagery across five semantic domains: Colors, Faces, Letters, Maps, and Shapes. Seventy-five typical imagers (based on their scores from the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire, VVIQ; 49 in-person, 26 online) completed this battery. On each trial, we recorded two imagery performance measures—accuracy and response times—and two subjective measures: vividness for the imagery and confidence for the perceptual trials. We found performance differences between imagery and perception in the domains of Color, Face, and Map, but not in the domains of Letters or Shapes, suggesting the existence of domain-specific processes that differentiate imagery from perception. Additionally, domain-specific performance was predicted by logistic regression models, further indicating that distinct mechanisms may support imagery and perception depending on the semantic content. Furthermore, unsupervised clustering analysis revealed a latent space of four clusters, fewer than the theoretically possible 10 clusters (2 modalities × 5 domains). This reduction suggests shared features across domains and modalities, pointing to a modality-independent semantic code, likely stored in higher-order cortical regions, that supports common high-level conceptual representations engaged by both imagery and perception. Trial-by-trial vividness ratings were stronger predictors of imagery task performance than the off-task VVIQ, indicating that in-the-moment vividness more accurately reflects individual imagery ability.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N