Neural Responses to Prior and Kinematic Information During Action Anticipation Vary with Expertise: fMRI Evidence from Activation and Connectivity.

Introduction: Action anticipation depends on both prior information and incoming kinematic cues, yet how their neural effects vary as a function of motor expertise remains unclear. Methods: We used fMRI to compare expert basketball players (n = 42) and nonathlete controls (n = 40) during a sport-spe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise Vol. 58; no. 9; pp. 1951 - 1966
Autores principales: HUANG, YUJING, WANG, DANLEI, LIU, CHANG, LUAN, MENGKAI
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Sep2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=196025220&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 196025220
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01959131
        4DP
      jtl: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
      issn: 01959131
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2026
      vid: 58
      iid: 9
      pid: 433
      pub: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      place: Baltimore, Maryland
    artinfo:
      ui:
        196025220
        196025220
        196025220
        10.1249/MSS.0000000000004017
        196025220
      ppf: 1951
      ppct: 15
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Neural Responses to Prior and Kinematic Information During Action Anticipation Vary with Expertise: fMRI Evidence from Activation and Connectivity.
      aug:
        au:
          HUANG, YUJING
          WANG, DANLEI
          LIU, CHANG
          LUAN, MENGKAI
        affil: School of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, CHINA
      sug:
        subj:
          Mental Processes
          Brain Physiology
          Kinematics Evaluation
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Functional Connectivity Evaluation
          Motor Skills
          Human
          Magnetic Resonance Imaging
          Basketball
          Athletes
          Cues
          Validity
          Athletic Performance Evaluation
          Parietal Lobe Physiology
          Frontal Lobe Physiology
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Occipital Lobe Physiology
          Temporal Lobe Physiology
      ab: Introduction: Action anticipation depends on both prior information and incoming kinematic cues, yet how their neural effects vary as a function of motor expertise remains unclear. Methods: We used fMRI to compare expert basketball players (n = 42) and nonathlete controls (n = 40) during a sport-specific anticipation task in which probabilistic prior cues preceded temporally occluded basketball shots. Priors were either absent or provided and, when provided, were congruent or incongruent with the subsequent outcome, enabling dissociation of prior availability and prior–kinematic congruency across cue and action observation stages. Results: Behavioral results showed that athletes were more accurate overall, but expertise advantages were condition specific. Group differences emerged when priors were absent or incongruent with the observed kinematics, whereas performance was comparable when priors were congruent. fMRI results showed that whole-brain and region-of-interest analyses linked prior information and prior–kinematic conflict to distributed frontoparietal regions implicated in action anticipation, with the left supplementary motor area (SMA) exhibiting reliable sensitivity to both prior availability and prior–kinematic congruency during action observation. Connectivity analyses further showed robust expertise-dependent effects that were not fully captured by regional activation alone. Athletes exhibited stronger SMA-centered coupling with posterior parietal and occipitotemporal regions, particularly under prior–kinematic conflict, along with broader enhancements in task-dependent connectivity among core nodes of the action observation network, whereas controls showed comparatively limited and more posteriorly focused connectivity effects. Conclusions: Together, these findings suggest that motor expertise is associated with network-level differences in how prior information and kinematic cues contribute to action anticipation, with SMA-centered coordination emerging as a prominent feature of these effects.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N