The Talking Lure: Raciolinguistic Ideologies of Reception and the Listening Subjects of American Vocal Biomarker AI.

In the United States, vocal biomarker AI is on the rise. The discourses encircling this interdisciplinary subfield propose that AI can identify discrete biological indicators of mental disability supposedly expressed in the sounds of the voice and detached from the sociocultural dimensions of commun...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current Anthropology Vol. 67; no. 4; pp. 624 - 645
Main Authors: Semel, Beth Michelle, Babcock, Joshua, Berman, Michael, Carr, E. Summerson, Ke-Schutte, Jay, Seaver, Nick, Yeh, Rihan
Format: Article
Published: University of Chicago Press Aug2026
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=196037894&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 196037894
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00113204
        CUA
      jtl: Current Anthropology
      issn: 00113204
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2026
      vid: 67
      iid: 4
      pid: 415
      pub: University of Chicago Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        196037894
        10.1086/741742
      ppf: 624
      ppct: 21
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: The Talking Lure: Raciolinguistic Ideologies of Reception and the Listening Subjects of American Vocal Biomarker AI.
      aug:
        au:
          Semel, Beth Michelle
          Babcock, Joshua
          Berman, Michael
          Carr, E. Summerson
          Ke-Schutte, Jay
          Seaver, Nick
          Yeh, Rihan
        affil:
          Department of Anthropology, Brown University, 128 Hope Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02906, USA. 13 IX 25
          Department of Anthropology, MS 006, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, Massachusetts 02453, USA. 14 IX 25
          Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago, 1126 East 59th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA. 18 IX 25
          Department of Sociology, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310058 P.R. China. 13 IX 25
          Department of Anthropology, Tufts University, 110 Eaton Hall, 5 The Green, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA. 19 IX 25
          Department of Anthropology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 532, La Jolla, California 92093, USA. 16 IX 25
      su:
        United States
        Racialization
        Artificial intelligence
        Racism
        Mental health services
        Attention
        Biometric identification software
        Computational intelligence
      sug:
        subj:
          Racialization
          Artificial intelligence
          Racism
          Mental health services
          Attention
          United States
          Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities
          Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals
          Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
          Biometric identification software
          Computational intelligence
      ab: In the United States, vocal biomarker AI is on the rise. The discourses encircling this interdisciplinary subfield propose that AI can identify discrete biological indicators of mental disability supposedly expressed in the sounds of the voice and detached from the sociocultural dimensions of communication. Many supporters and makers of vocal biomarker AI claim that AI holds revolutionary potential for American mental health care because it can identify mentally distressed speaking subjects based on these biological-acoustical features alone, without "hearing" any other categories of difference, such as race. Drawing from fieldwork with a lab that crafted an anthropomorphic agent for their vocal biomarker–detecting prototype, I deploy the analytic of the "talking lure" to demonstrate that racialization can coexist alongside, and indeed even materially enable, ideologies of AI's race-evasive listening. Members of the lab at once enacted, depended on, and somewhat underplayed the significance of various processes of racialization that shaped the foundations of their technology's AI model. By tracing the racialized and gendered hierarchies of listening and auditory personhood that were assembled and disassembled across the lab's technology development pipeline, I outline and challenge vocal biomarker AI's implicit theorization of race as an internal auditory signal that lies in wait to be either identified or disentangled from disability.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N