The Reception of Wolfson's Philo in Philonic Scholarship.

In 1947, Harry Austryn Wolfson caused a sensation in the world of Philonic studies when he published his two magisterial volumes on Philo's thought. For decades, his distinctive interpretation of Philo's achievement was included in every survey of views on the Alexandrian. Yet, from the start, Wolfs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Aleph: Historical Studies in Science & Judaism Vol. 24; no. 1/2; pp. 11 - 31
Autor principal: Runia, David T.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Indiana University Press 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=196086024&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 196086024
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15651525
        AF8
      jtl: Aleph: Historical Studies in Science & Judaism
      issn: 15651525
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2024
      vid: 24
      iid: 1/2
      pid: 211
      pub: Indiana University Press
    artinfo:
      ui: 196086024
      ppf: 11
      ppct: 20
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 326KB
      tig:
        atl: The Reception of Wolfson's Philo in Philonic Scholarship.
      aug:
        au: Runia, David T.
      su:
        Philosophy methodology
        Contextualism (Philosophy)
        Philo, of Alexandria, ca. 25 B.C.-ca. 50
        Philosophers
        Scholars
      sug:
        subj:
          Philosophy methodology
          Contextualism (Philosophy)
          Philo, of Alexandria, ca. 25 B.C.-ca. 50
          Philosophers
          Scholars
      ab: In 1947, Harry Austryn Wolfson caused a sensation in the world of Philonic studies when he published his two magisterial volumes on Philo's thought. For decades, his distinctive interpretation of Philo's achievement was included in every survey of views on the Alexandrian. Yet, from the start, Wolfson's extremely systematic approach, based on an idiosyncratic methodology, failed to gain widespread acceptance. As Philonic studies progressed, the limitations of Wolfson's work became more apparent. His disregard for the formal aspect of Philo's writings and his failure to contextualize Philo within the philosophical landscape of his time increasingly undermined the study's credibility. Consequently, the actual influence of Wolfson's study on the course of Philonic studies has remained quite limited. Nevertheless, his study contains valuable insights and remains a potentially useful resource for research.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Aleph: Historical Studies in Science & Judaism is the property of Indiana University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Aleph: Historical Studies in Science & Judaism
      holder: Indiana University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N