THE VIOLENCE OF ABSTRACTION: Fredric Jameson, the "Asiatic Mode," and the Problem of Asia.

This forum introduction revisits Fredric Jameson’s engagement with Asia by focusing on a central tension in his work: the productive power of his world-historical method and the limitations of its reliance on the typological figure of the "Asiatic mode of production." Rather than treating this tensi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Kritika Kultura no. 50; pp. 75 - 88
Autores principales: Torres Reyes, Maria Luisa, Lee, Alex Taek-Gwang
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Kritika Kultura Jul2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=196277920&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 196277920
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        20946937
        786B
      jtl: Kritika Kultura
      issn: 20946937
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2026
      iid: 50
      pid: 51553
      pub: Kritika Kultura
    artinfo:
      ui: 196277920
      ppf: 75
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.1MB
      tig:
        atl: THE VIOLENCE OF ABSTRACTION: Fredric Jameson, the "Asiatic Mode," and the Problem of Asia.
      aug:
        au:
          Torres Reyes, Maria Luisa
          Lee, Alex Taek-Gwang
        affil:
          University of Santo Tomas.
          Kyung Hee University.
      sug:
      keyword:
        archipelagic studies
        Asia
        cognitive mapping
        Fredric Jameson
        Marxism
        national allegory
        postcolonial theory
        provincializing
        refunctioning
        world literature
      ab: This forum introduction revisits Fredric Jameson’s engagement with Asia by focusing on a central tension in his work: the productive power of his world-historical method and the limitations of its reliance on the typological figure of the "Asiatic mode of production." Rather than treating this tension as grounds for either dismissal or recuperation, the essay argues that Jameson’s categories become most useful precisely at the point where they encounter their limits, opening the possibility for alternative modes of theoretical practice. It proposes refunctioning and provincializing as complementary methodologies through which inherited concepts are displaced, reworked, and renewed in relation to the heterogeneous histories of Asia, understood not as a singular civilizational object but as a field of uneven, conflictual, and overlapping historical trajectories. Reading across contributions from China, Korea, Turkey, Indonesia, and the Philippines, the forum demonstrates how concepts such as national allegory, postmodernism, and cognitive mapping acquire new analytical force when engaged with semiperipheral, postcolonial, and archipelagic conditions. These essays show that theory does not simply travel across contexts; it is transformed through them, revealing Jameson’s legacy less as a closed body of thought than as an ongoing and unfinished field of critical production.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Kritika Kultura is the property of Kritika Kultura and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Kritika Kultura
      holder: Kritika Kultura
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2026
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N