When correlation matters: a practical guide to dealing with uncertainty in the case of data disaggregation.

Correctly modeling the relationships between correlated, uncertain input data is crucial for producing accurate uncertainty estimates of model results. This requires both an uncertainty analysis that accounts for correlations and the appropriate communication of the results, so that other analysts c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Industrial Ecology Vol. 30; no. 2; pp. 665 - 682
Autores principales: Schulte, Simon, Jakobs, Arthur, Lupton, Rick
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Apr2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=196447903&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 196447903
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10881980
        FL1
      jtl: Journal of Industrial Ecology
      issn: 10881980
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2026
      vid: 30
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        196447903
        10.1007/s44498-026-00048-6
      ppf: 665
      ppct: 17
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: When correlation matters: a practical guide to dealing with uncertainty in the case of data disaggregation.
      aug:
        au:
          Schulte, Simon
          Jakobs, Arthur
          Lupton, Rick
        affil:
          https://ror.org/04m5j1k67 Life Cycle Sustainability, Department of Sustainability and Planning, Aalborg University, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
          https://ror.org/0245cg223 Industrial Ecology Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
          https://ror.org/03eh3y714 Center for Energy and Environmental Sciences & Center for Nuclear Engineering and Sciences, Laboratory for Energy Systems Analysis, Technology Assessment Group, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
          https://ror.org/002h8g185 Centre for Sustainable Energy Systems, Institute of Sustainability and Climate Change, University of Bath, Bath, UK
      su:
        Electronic data processing
        Industrial ecology
        Statistical correlation
        Uncertainty (Information theory)
        Maximum entropy method
        Input-output analysis
        Distribution (Probability theory)
      sug:
        subj:
          Electronic data processing
          Industrial ecology
          Data Processing, Hosting, and Related Services
          Statistical correlation
          Uncertainty (Information theory)
          Maximum entropy method
          Input-output analysis
          Distribution (Probability theory)
      keyword:
        Dirichlet
        IO
        LCA
        Maximum entropy
        MFA
        Dirichlet
        IO
        LCA
        Maximum entropy
        MFA
      ab: Correctly modeling the relationships between correlated, uncertain input data is crucial for producing accurate uncertainty estimates of model results. This requires both an uncertainty analysis that accounts for correlations and the appropriate communication of the results, so that other analysts can correctly interpret the reported uncertainties. However, neither is common practice in industrial ecology modeling. A typical case for correlated results is the disaggregation of a total value into uncertain shares, for which we present a practical yet robust approach to model the uncertainty. Our approach is based on two standard and two generalized Dirichlet distributions, and it uses the maximum entropy principle to choose minimally biased distribution parameters in the absence of specific known values. We discuss how correlation should be communicated to preserve accurate uncertainty information and provide examples to quantify the difference it makes to the results when the correlation is simplified or completely neglected. The proposed procedure will improve the accuracy of uncertainty quantification in Material Flow Analysis (e.g. where allocation coefficients split flows to sectors), Input Output Analysis (e.g. where aggregated environmental impact data has to be disaggregated to detailed economic sectors), and some instances in Life Cycle Assessment (e.g. where market shares are uncertain). Last but not least, to lower the technical barrier to applying these approaches, we provide easy-to-use Python and R packages which automate the approach.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N