Outcomes That Matter in Gastrointestinal Cancer Care: A Focus Group Study of Patient‐Centred Outcomes Identified by Patients and Care Partners.

Background and Objective: Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers pose a substantial burden on patients and care partners, yet outcomes research and clinical tools remain heavily weighted toward clinical endpoints over patient‐centred outcomes (PCOs). Without standardised PCOs, risk communication and shared d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Health Expectations Vol. 29; no. 4; pp. 1 - 15
Autores principales: Gombay, Anna, Ding, Anna, Mahar, Alyson, Hsu, Amy T., Gotlib Conn, Lesley, Armah, Jessica, Kosyachkova, Ekaterina, Deleemans, Julie, Ludwig, Claire, Karim, Allia, Coburn, Natalie, Hallet, Julie
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Aug2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=196480495&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 196480495
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13696513
        EVY
      jtl: Health Expectations
      issn: 13696513
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2026
      vid: 29
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        196480495
        196480495
        196480495
        10.1111/hex.70835
        196480495
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Outcomes That Matter in Gastrointestinal Cancer Care: A Focus Group Study of Patient‐Centred Outcomes Identified by Patients and Care Partners.
      aug:
        au:
          Gombay, Anna
          Ding, Anna
          Mahar, Alyson
          Hsu, Amy T.
          Gotlib Conn, Lesley
          Armah, Jessica
          Kosyachkova, Ekaterina
          Deleemans, Julie
          Ludwig, Claire
          Karim, Allia
          Coburn, Natalie
          Hallet, Julie
        affil: Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto Ontario,, Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Gastrointestinal Neoplasms Therapy
          Patient Centered Care
          Outcome Assessment
          Patient Attitudes
          Caregiver Attitudes
          Risk Assessment
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Canada
          Qualitative Studies
          Tertiary Health Care
          Age Factors
          Sex Factors
          Semi-Structured Interview
          Purposive Sample
          Thematic Analysis
          Decision Making, Shared
          Funding Source
          Checklists
          Life Style
          Health Resource Utilization
          Functional Status
          Access to Information
          Coping
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background and Objective: Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers pose a substantial burden on patients and care partners, yet outcomes research and clinical tools remain heavily weighted toward clinical endpoints over patient‐centred outcomes (PCOs). Without standardised PCOs, risk communication and shared decision‐making may revolve around endpoints misaligned with patient priorities. We aimed to identify PCOs meaningful to patients with GI cancer and their care partners. Design, Setting and Participants: We conducted a qualitative focus group study with adult patients with a GI cancer diagnosis and their care partners, recruited from a tertiary cancer centre and patient partner organisations in Canada. Focus groups used open‐ended questions and hypothetical patient personas to elicit PCOs. Two researchers independently extracted PCO concepts from verbatim transcripts and synthesised them using a deductive‐inductive clustering approach informed by thematic analysis and the patient‐centred care framework. Results: Overall, 15 patients and 13 care partners participated. We extracted 254 PCO concepts and consolidated them into 55 unique PCOs organised under 7 parent clusters: care experience (31% of mentions), psychosocial (25%), treatment (16%), lifestyle (12%), healthcare utilisation (8%), functional status (4%), and symptoms (3%). Six PCOs accounted for approximately half of all mentions: communication, care access, information access, treatment understanding, coping abilities, and finances. Patients most often raised psychosocial PCOs, whereas care partners more frequently mentioned functional status and symptom PCOs. Treatment‐related PCOs were a mutual concern. Discussion and Conclusions: Patients and care partners identified 55 PCOs spanning dimensions not consistently captured in existing GI cancer instruments. These PCOs can be integrated in the development of a core outcome set for patient‐centred risk assessment and individualised prediction in GI cancer care. Patient and Public Contribution: Three patient partners with lived experience of cancer contributed to the study as co‐investigators. They informed the focus group guide and its sequencing, advised on the language of recruitment materials, and refined data analysis and interpretation. Patients and care partners also took part as focus group participants.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N