Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Inpatient Fall Risk Using Electronic Health Record Data.

Background: Falls are the most common hospital-acquired adverse event, leading to extended hospitalization, loss of independence, disability, and premature death. Routine fall risk assessments are time-consuming, even with limited factors. An AI-derived fall prediction model can provide more compreh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Nursing Reports Vol. 16; no. 8; pp. 283 - 306
Autores principales: Mordiffi, Siti Zubaidah, Guo, Xiujuan, Goh, Mien Li, Ngiam, Kee Yuan, Wong, Neng Wei, Chua, Jenny, Furqan, Mohammad Shaheryar, Chew, Han Shi Jocelyn
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: MDPI Aug2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=196616853&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 196616853
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        2039439X
        EGNT
      jtl: Nursing Reports
      issn: 2039439X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2026
      vid: 16
      iid: 8
      pid: 97109
      pub: MDPI
    artinfo:
      ui:
        196616853
        196616853
        196616853
        10.3390/nursrep16080283
        196616853
      ppf: 283
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Inpatient Fall Risk Using Electronic Health Record Data.
      aug:
        au:
          Mordiffi, Siti Zubaidah
          Guo, Xiujuan
          Goh, Mien Li
          Ngiam, Kee Yuan
          Wong, Neng Wei
          Chua, Jenny
          Furqan, Mohammad Shaheryar
          Chew, Han Shi Jocelyn
        affil: Nursing Department, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore 119074, Singapore
      sug:
        subj:
          Machine Learning
          Models, Theoretical
          Accidental Falls Risk Factors
          Electronic Health Records
          Hospitalization
          Prediction Models
          Funding Source
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Descriptive Statistics
          Validation Studies
          Artificial Intelligence
          Decision Trees
          Adverse Health Care Event
          Nonexperimental Studies
          Retrospective Design
          Record Review
          Logistic Regression
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Falls are the most common hospital-acquired adverse event, leading to extended hospitalization, loss of independence, disability, and premature death. Routine fall risk assessments are time-consuming, even with limited factors. An AI-derived fall prediction model can provide more comprehensive and comparably accurate risk predictions quickly and as often as needed. Objective: To develop and validate a fall prediction model for fall risk in adult inpatients. Methods: Patient records from 2016 were extracted from the adult inpatient database, including information from the Electronic Inpatient Medication Records, SAP, and Hospital Incident Reporting System. The sample consisted of 1506 cases (1:5 faller to non-faller). The fall prediction model was trained using the following four variables: demographics, diagnosis, medications, and surgery. Data sources included the hospital's data repository, integrating admission/discharge, pharmacy, laboratory, and incident reports. Results: The support vector machine model performed best among all tested models, achieving an AUC of 0.803, recall of 0.816, and precision of 0.440. In the validation cohort (978 patients: 163 fallers and 815 non-fallers), the fall prediction model demonstrated moderate-to-good discrimination (AUC 0.79), with accuracy of 0.67, sensitivity of 0.46, and specificity of 0.86. Compared with the nursing four-item fall risk assessment, which showed lower discrimination (AUC 0.65, accuracy 0.65, sensitivity 0.58, specificity 0.72), the fall prediction model had better specificity and overall discrimination, though the nursing tool was more sensitive in identifying fallers. Conclusions: The fall prediction model using demographics, diagnoses, medication, and surgery data predicts falls risk effectively. It enables timely, accurate risk assessments and supports preventive interventions, saving nurses' time for direct patient care.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N