Temporal parts unmotivated.
Opposes primary and most powerful claims that have been made on behalf of perdurantism, the view that material objects perjure. Debate about the nature of persistence over time; Material constitution; Support for the doctrine of temporal parts; Special theory of relativity; Intrinsic change; Doctri...
| Publicado en: | Philosophical Review Vol. 107; no. 2; pp. 225 - 261 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Duke University Press
Apr98
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=1971975&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 1971975 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00318108 PLR jtl: Philosophical Review issn: 00318108 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr98 vid: 107 iid: 2 pid: 154 pub: Duke University Press artinfo: ui: 1971975 10.2307/2998484 ppf: 225 ppct: 36 formats: tig: atl: Temporal parts unmotivated. aug: au: C. Rea, Michael su: Object (Philosophy) Spacetime Special relativity (Physics) sug: subj: Object (Philosophy) Spacetime Special relativity (Physics) ab: Opposes primary and most powerful claims that have been made on behalf of perdurantism, the view that material objects perjure. Debate about the nature of persistence over time; Material constitution; Support for the doctrine of temporal parts; Special theory of relativity; Intrinsic change; Doctrine of Human supervenience; Possibility of fission; Basic similarity of space and time. pubtype: Review doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 1998 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|