CONSTITUTIONAL LAW -- ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE -- FOURTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT LOCAL GOVERNMENT MAY RESTRICT THE LEADING OF ITS INVOCATIONS TO REPRESENTATIVES OF JUDEO-CHRISTIAN RELIGIONS. --Simpson v. Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, 404 F.3d 276 (4th Cir.),. cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 426 (2005)
The article discusses the U.S. Court of Appeals case Simpson v. Chesterfied County Board of Supervisors. This case seeks to determine whether it is legal for a local government to restrict the leading of its invocations to representatives of Judeo-Christian religions. The details of the case are pre...
| Publicado en: | Harvard Law Review Vol. 119; no. 4; pp. 1223 - 1231 |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Harvard Law Review Association
Feb2006
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=19865002&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 19865002 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0017811X HLR jtl: Harvard Law Review issn: 0017811X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Feb2006 vid: 119 iid: 4 pid: 2349 pub: Harvard Law Review Association artinfo: ui: 19865002 ppf: 1223 ppct: 8 formats: tig: atl: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW -- ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE -- FOURTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT LOCAL GOVERNMENT MAY RESTRICT THE LEADING OF ITS INVOCATIONS TO REPRESENTATIVES OF JUDEO-CHRISTIAN RELIGIONS. --Simpson v. Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, 404 F.3d 276 (4th Cir.),. cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 426 (2005) aug: su: Simpson v. Chesterfied County Board of Supervisors (Supreme Court case) Actions & defenses (Law) Invocation Local government Religion & politics United States sug: subj: United States Simpson v. Chesterfied County Board of Supervisors (Supreme Court case) Actions & defenses (Law) Invocation Local government Religion & politics ab: The article discusses the U.S. Court of Appeals case Simpson v. Chesterfied County Board of Supervisors. This case seeks to determine whether it is legal for a local government to restrict the leading of its invocations to representatives of Judeo-Christian religions. The details of the case are presented along with the court's decision. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2006 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|