Deservingness and emotions: Applying the structural model of deservingness to the analysis of affective reactions to outcomes.
This chapter describes how a structural model of deservingness governed by a principle of balance may be applied to the analysis of emotions relating to deserved or undeserved outcomes of other or of self. In each case perceived deservingness/undeservingness is assumed to mediate both general emotio...
| Publicado en: | European Review of Social Psychology Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 38 - 74 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
2006
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=21008113&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 21008113 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 10463283 RF9 jtl: European Review of Social Psychology issn: 10463283 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: 2006 vid: 17 iid: 1 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 21008113 10.1080/10463280600662321 ppf: 38 ppct: 36 formats: tig: atl: Deservingness and emotions: Applying the structural model of deservingness to the analysis of affective reactions to outcomes. aug: au: Feather, N.T. affil: Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia su: Emotions Guilt (Psychology) Balance theory (Social theory) Structural frame models Psychological literature sug: subj: Emotions Guilt (Psychology) Balance theory (Social theory) Structural frame models Psychological literature ab: This chapter describes how a structural model of deservingness governed by a principle of balance may be applied to the analysis of emotions relating to deserved or undeserved outcomes of other or of self. In each case perceived deservingness/undeservingness is assumed to mediate both general emotional reactions such as pleasure and dissatisfaction and discrete emotions such as sympathy, resentment, disappointment, and guilt, depending on outcome (positive, negative), the evaluative structure of action/outcome relations, and whether outcomes relate to other or to self. Evidence from studies of reactions to success or failure, and reactions to penalties for offences, supports the analysis, as does earlier research on tall poppies or high achievers. The theoretical analysis is then related to the wider psychological literature on justice and emotions, especially to appraisal theory as exemplified in Weiner's approach. Also discussed are issues concerned with reciprocal relations between affect and deservingness, thoughtful versus automatic processing, new extensions of balance theory, and variables such as like/dislike relations, ingroup/outgroup relations, and perceived responsibility that would moderate perceived deservingness/undeservingness, thereby influencing the emotions that are assumed to be activated in each case. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|