The End of Domestic Violence.

In this article, I examine the rationales that have been given for extending domestic violence legislation to associated persons. I argue that the empirical and principled rationales are unfounded and that the ideological rationale is reactionary. With regard to the empirical rationale, the extent o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Modern Law Review Vol. 69; no. 5; pp. 770 - 792
Autor principal: Reece, Helen
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=21979910&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 21979910
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00267961
        D8H
      jtl: Modern Law Review
      issn: 00267961
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2006
      vid: 69
      iid: 5
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        21979910
        10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00609.x
      ppf: 770
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 205KB
      tig:
        atl: The End of Domestic Violence.
      aug:
        au: Reece, Helen
        affil: Reader in Law, Birkbeck College
      su:
        Domestic violence laws
        Violence
        Social groups
        Social isolation
        Equality
      sug:
        subj:
          Domestic violence laws
          Violence
          Social groups
          Social isolation
          Equality
      keyword:
        associated persons
        Crime and Disorder Act 2004
        Domestic violence
        intimate violence
        Part IV of the Family Law Act 1996
        violence against women
      ab: In this article, I examine the rationales that have been given for extending domestic violence legislation to associated persons. I argue that the empirical and principled rationales are unfounded and that the ideological rationale is reactionary. With regard to the empirical rationale, the extent of violence that the aggregate of associated persons suffers is not high enough to justify privileging associated persons over other citizens with regard to protection from violence. In relation to the principled rationale, the impetus for domestic violence legislation was based on isolation and inequality, which are not experienced in particular by the category of associated persons when taken as a whole. With regard to the ideological rationale, it is worrying that intimacy and equality are emerging as the touchstones of a newer rationale for domestic violence legislation, which rightly has more to do with isolation and inequality than intimacy and equality.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Modern Law Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Modern Law Review
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2006
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N